Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Pierced Flight--A Few Cantos On Anger, Madness and the Daimonic

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Pierced Flight"


[The name I've given to the photo is my own poetic response to the image. A sculpture in Princeton, NJ sculpture garden. Click on it to enlarge the image. Photo by Warren Falcon, September 2008. Currently seeking the names of the sculptor and sculpture to give full and due credit]

This image graphically depicts the crucifixion of matter in flight, that flight toward transcendence against suffering and death and the flight of the skewering pole toward it's targeted object in flight; always seeking reversals, the flight of the Imagination pierced and the piercing which halts mid-flight between the opposites where Imagination enables the human spirit to ascend and descend the cruciform pole of the axis mundi, the Center, from which the worlds within worlds are spectrally formed,-- from Wikipedia online :

The axis mundi (also cosmic axis, world axis, world pillar, columna cerului, center of the world) is a ubiquitous symbol that crosses human cultures. The image expresses a point of connection between sky and earth where the four compass directions meet. At this point travel and correspondence is made between higher and lower realms. Communication from lower realms may ascend to higher ones and blessings from higher realms may descend to lower ones and be disseminated to all.[ The spot functions as the omphalos (navel), the world's point of beginning.

The axis mundi image appears in every region of the world and takes many forms. The image is both feminine (an umbilical providing nourishment) and masculine (a phallus providing insemination into a uterus). It may have the form of a natural object (a mountain, a tree, a vine, a stalk, a column of smoke or fire), or a product of human manufacture (a staff, a tower, a ladder, a staircase, a maypole, a cross, a steeple, a rope, a totem pole, a pillar, a spire). Its proximity to heaven may carry implications that are chiefly religious ( pagoda, temple, mount, church) or secular (obelisk, minaret, lighthouse, rocket, skyscraper). The image appears in religious and secular contexts. The axis mundi symbol may be found in cultures utilizing shamanic practices or animistic belief systems, in major world religions, and in technologically advanced "urban centers." As Mircea Eliade observed: "Every Microcosm, every inhabited region, has a Centre; that is to say, a place that is sacred above all."
-- from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_mundi

This powerful image emotionally expresses the dhukka--unsatisfactoriness; incompleteness; suffering -- the tragic nobility of the human condition. We must not draw the conclusion that we should not try to fly nor should we attempt to expunge or deny the exquisite, creative cauldron, no escaping it, which is conscious material existence.


Perhaps I might say: I need people to a higher degree than others, and at the same time much less...
...because there was nothing left which would link me to them...
-- my rearrangement of quotes from text of C.G. Jung immediately below

The repressed value contains transformative energies and a consciousness of its own; that to achieve consciousness and discover the nature of one's own inferiority it is at times necessary to go against one's own ego-dominated commandments.

-- Charles Ponce, Working the Soul, pgs. 68-69


Prelude -- The Daimon According to C.G. Jung

I have had much trouble getting along with my ideas. There
was a daimon in me, and in the end its presence proved decisive.
It overpowered me, and if I was at times ruthless it was
because I was in the grip of the daimon. I could never stop at
anything once attained. I had to hasten on, to catch up with my
vision. Since my contemporaries, understandably, could not
perceive my vision, they saw only a fool rushing ahead.

I have offended many people, for as soon as I saw that they
did not understand me, that was the end of the matter so far as
I was concerned. I had to move on. I had no patience with people
aside from my patients. I had to obey an inner law which
was imposed on me and left me no freedom of choice. Of course
I did not always obey it. How can anyone live without inconsistency?

For some people I was continually present and close to them
so long as they were related to my inner world; but then it
might happen that I was no longer with them, because there
was nothing left which would link me to them. I had to learn
painfully that people continued to exist even when they had
nothing more to say to me. Many excited in me a feeling of living
humanity, but only when they appeared within the magic circle
of psychology; next moment, when the spotlight cast its beam
elsewhere, there was nothing to be seen. I was able to become
intensely interested in many people; but as soon as I had seen
through them, the magic was gone. In this way I made many
enemies. A creative person has little power over his own life.
He is not free. He is captive and driven by his daimon.

"Shamefully"
A power wrests away the heart from us
For the Heavenly Ones each demand sacrifice;
But if it should be withheld
Never has that led to good?

says Holderlin.

This lack of freedom has been a great sorrow to me. Often I
felt as if I were on a battlefield, saying, "Now you have fallen,
my good comrade, but I must go on." For "shamefully a power
wrests away the heart from us." I am fond of you, indeed I love
you, but I cannot stay. There is something heart-rending about
that. And I myself am the victim; I cannot stay. But the daimon
manages things so that one comes through, and blessed
inconsistency sees to it that in flagrant contrast to my "
disloyalty" I can keep faith in unsuspected measure.

Perhaps I might say: I need people to a higher degree than
others, and at the same time much less. When the daimon is at
work, one is always too close and too far. Only when it is silent
can one achieve moderation.

The daimon of creativity has ruthlessly had its way with me.
The ordinary undertakings I planned usually had the worst of
it...
-- C.G. Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections, pg. 355-357, Vintage Books, 1989


Canto One -- Of Madness

What's madness but nobility of soul at odds with circumstance? -- Theodore Roethke

What I find most astonishing -- aside from that belief of mine, which never ceases to surprise me by the very fact of its surprising lack of pleasantness, the belief that I might very easily -- as they say -- lose my mind one day, not that I suspect I am about to, or am even...nearby...for I'm not that sort; merely that it is not beyond...happening: some gentle loosening of the moorings sending the balloon adrift -- and I think that is the only outweighing thing: adrift; the...becoming a stranger...the world, quite...uninvolved, for I never see it as violent, only a drifting...But I could never do it -- go adrift-- for what would become of you?
-- Edward Albee, opening lines from A Delicate Balance, A Play In Three Acts, Samuel French, 1967


I wish there was something practical I could say about madness.

To change only one word in a line of poetry by the late Anne Sexton for the purpose of my own attempt at a practical essaying on the topic at hand, "I was born doing field work in madness," which I suppose has it's own practicality, some Devil's, nay, Daimon's Primer imprinted, though not in literal print, in every human brain and spine. For all this hissing amiss and gathering at lost crawses and these grizzled grists for Blakean Satanic Mental Mills, in madness the "Daimon's in the details", drivel and dervishes prevailing.

Enough people--Carl Jung, the innovative Swiss psychoanalyst and writer being one, and he speaks much of this, of the daimon, of madness, of mentations foments--have discovered that there are threads in, methods to, madness; indeed, there are myths in madness, "myth-ods" (to be wordly playful with emphasis on the -odds), so the meanings therein need to be attended to, midwived, espied via spurious speculums pushed, pulled and pried through into bridges between worlds, between the "normal" consensus world and that of the unconscious which has its own ever-shifting "norms" in terms consistent internally and infernally to itself.

Practical things to say about madness and its myth-ods are hard to come by, at least for me, therefore I can and will speak only of my own madness and of some of my experiences with the madness in others. We do have recourse to religions of all sorts, to artists from bone carvings to cave walls, to castles to museums, to madhouses to mausoleums and the marbled warbling more-- those poets and writers like Nagarjuna, like Jesus, Shakespeare, like Blake, like Joyce, like Beckett, like Gertrude Stein, like so very very many gone naying neti neti before us here now in rumored, malhumored, millenia-wired primal primers in mind of mind on Mind, of going beyond it by going more deeply into It.

Madness justifiably disturbs us so much that we invent, and not with bad intentions, theories and techniques about mind and mental illness, we concoct noxious potions and potages to reign it in, to explain it, to take the reptile-filled smelly sump of human soul, fortunately not the only place on the human soul map, and drain it, dry it, then return the once-were-mad ones, ourselves, back to consensus reality, two lumps of sugar in the tepid tea and nevermind that a tree swaying just out the window at twilight menacingly or mercifully becomes in cornea-corners and viscous-veined eyewebs an ever-maker soft-soughed shaker of mind.


Canto Two
-- "Hell Has Value,"
A Monstrous, Mad Confession



Chthonic --882, from Gk. khthonios "in the earth," from khthon "the earth, solid surface of the earth" (mostly poetic) from PIE root *dhghem- (cf. first element in chameleon also L. humus "earth, soil," humilis "low;" Lith. zeme, O.C.S. zemlja "earth;" Skt. ksam- "earth" (opposed to "sky"); O.Ir. du, gen. don "place," earlier "earth"). Chthonian is from 1850.
autochthonic -- 646, "one sprung from the soil he inhabits" (pl. autochthones), from Gk. autokhthon, from auto- "self" + khthon "land".

What rough beast slouches toward Bethlehem to be born? -- William Butler Yeats, from his poem, The Second Coming

Hold back the edges of your gowns, Ladies, we're going through hell.

-- William Carlos Williams from Introduction to Howl by Allen Ginsberg

Pandaemonium, literally, pan = all or "every", and "daemon, δαιμόνιον", meaning "little spirit" or "little angel", or, as Christians interpreted it, "little daemon", and later, "demon" (thus roughly translated as "All Demons"); or it can be interpreted as Παν-δαιμον-ειον = "all-demon-place". John Milton's name for Hell in Paradise Lost. Also, chaos; tumultuous or lawless violence, plus a loud, riotous uproar, outburst.

The daimon throws us down, makes us traitors to our ideals and cherished convictions -- traitors to the selves we thought we were.
-- C.G. Jung

But you know it's almost like using a diamond for a paper weight to use [personal] stories for entertainment. -- Rachel Naomi Remen speaking about "listening generously" on NPR radio show, Speaking of Faith.

[Please note that my dialogues with Daimon are active imagination, a technique modernized and developed by Carl Jung in his work with the contents of the unconscious. Joan Poelvoorde describes this technique in her article on the daimonic which you may click here to read:
http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/261056/3d8a21a460/1662500219/64e097a070/]


Four years ago I had my clearest image of and most momentous encounter with my own daimon.

I always intuitively knew it was there within me, that resistant, oppositional force with it's own agenda and power made all the more insistently, compulsively powerful because it was rejected and repressed. So much for all my sincere Michael Jackson-esque Mystical Moon-Walking toward imagined transcendence-of-the-dusty material, instinctual, natural world and, of course, according to the gurus, avatars, ministers, high priests and priestesses and values of those systems and pseudo-systems they expounded, to quote my extremely irreverent, mocking Daimon, "I done them all wrong."

This, my Daimon, when I finally saw him, was a dark, underworld, Grendel-like creature who hulkingly hunched before me while crossing the street at W. 91st and Central Park West one day heading reluctantly and resentfully toward a professional commitment that I had come to loath. I realize now it was the Daimon's loathing and my ego was finally catching up to his dark awareness and wisdom that the dream of transcendence as I had been taught to view it, as that daimon-possessed bard John Lennon once sang, that "dream is over".

I stopped mid-street and said outloud, "I SEE YOU!! What do you have to say to me?!"

A car horn blared as I dodged and scuttled to a park bench with 5 minutes to spare before the dreaded meeting with the "Holy Pokeys" as I had come to call my now very alienated once-were-compadres for as it appeared to me they were convinced that their sanctimonious boundary-disrespecting, persistent "holy hokey pokery" (you know the drill--everybody do the same imitative monkey thing and "then shake it all about") plying at my and each others inner privates and venial vicera was good for me and them when for me, and the Daimon in retrospect, it felt like an elaborate form of psycho-spiritual entertainment of egoic proportions mimicing transformative encounter while actually being a form of Jerry Springer-like pornography, hysterically baring and spilling one's most sacred and secret guts naively, foolishly, luridly and, often enough, self-destructively and humiliatingly before undeserving inflated others, their being in desperate need of real confession, I'll grant, but not necessarily in public, that fickle granter of temporary grace and enduring disgrace. This insistent poking and probing by group others supposedly demonstrated a presentiment of protective community, secure family belonging, good "process" and helpful wholing purpose--in my experience prurience by any other name...

Hastily seated I asked again, "What do you have to say to me?"

Daimon answered, "I fucking HATE spirituality!!!"

I burst into mad laughter for he had named an as yet inexpressible and yet to be expressed difficult-to-own truth that I had been unable to own up to much less confess to another and most certainly not to the "Saintly Sm-others". As he and I spoke he ragefully told me that I had kept him "in the deepest and darkest depths of Hell" and I knew when I heard him that this was true. I wept for I had been very much unconsciously identified with him as him, a persecutable and persecuted monster and yet I had also persecuted him and myself and, of course, given the inexorable law of projection, others of daimonic character. He hated spirituality which would not at all embrace his essential chthonic (underworld) instinctual energy, "SACRED ENERGY!" he screamed, "They--the "spirit identified ones--have essentially rejected the earth, matter, nature." I knew then that I would have to remove myself from all so-called and supposedly spiritual affiliations professionally and inwardly introjected. Excising/integrating these introjections proved, and still does, to be difficult, slow, stubborn and tenacious work as these have served as rigid character defenses propelling me away from the depths, away from the chthonic having been precociously exposed to the chthonic as a child. Granted, when one encounters the archetypal chthonic no matter the childhood, horrific or good enough, one is frightened and repelled and thus our character defenses come to our aid to prevent fragmentation at any cost and by any means necessary.

Regarding this I refer the reader to two books by Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death, especially chapter four, "Human Character As A Vital Lie", and Escape From Evil, the book entire. I also highly recommend Donald Kalsched's excellent and instructional The Inner Word Of Trauma, Archetypal Defenses Of The Human Spirit. All three of these books (there are, of course, more) give an appreciative view of the protective at all cost by any means necessary functions of "character" and its defenses and why it stalwartly, bravely, mechanically serves us yet in so doing prevents our growth into authenticity and "full catastrophe, and messy, living", to paraphrase and add to a quote by Zorba, refering the reader here to the novel by Nikos Kazantzakis, and the film, Zorba the Greek--Greece being a primal culture of the split between matter and spirit, experience and ideals, works and grace caught creatively in the split depicted in the sculpture I call "Pierced Flight" at the beginning of this essay--Zorba celebrates the splits and these "gods of messiness" or, posibly, rather, those gods who tolerate and contain messiness (often messes Themselves), of instincts, of earth and the noble tragedy of human impulses toward transcendence. He also assumes there is an order, perhaps like Blake's Heaven, which contains the chaos and disorder, each presuming and subsuming the other. The final dance at the end of the movie--the two main characters dancing together, one, "Boss", Apollonian (god of order and differentiation of consciousness) and the other, wild Zorba, Dionysian (god of disorder and merging with the unconscious)--with its tragi-comic disaster is a dance within the full, feeling, conscious catastrophe danced ecstaticly in the teeth of the opposites in humorous triumph and defiance while consenting to the conditions of existence, the givens, the exigencies, making the best of a bad human situation affirming the mad dreamers and mad dancers they, and we, always already are, utterly human. And that, it appears, thank the gods, is more than enough because it often seems we are all here to endure and to clean up the gods' messes, our reserving the right to kvetch all along the way.

I told Daimon that I did not know how to work with and for him but that we could try to find a way. I also knew, and he confirmed, that our work together would offend myself as I knew myself to be as well as many others I had once been associated with personally and professionally. "Was I prepared to lose all this?" he asked. Already miserable I said, "Yes." I then said I wanted to take him out of Hell. To my surprise he told me that I "should not and could not lose the Hell realm. It has tremendous value to the soul but humankind has not been able yet to assimilate this aspect of soul much less acknowledge any value to it." This got my attention!! Having been born into, bred into, and educated into a Christian Fundamentalist church and culture (this permeates all of America and not just the South where I am from) where Hell has no value to humans unless we're cursing others to go there and has value to a rigidly "just and exacting deity" (Jehovah) I was "all ears." This news of the value of Hell was tough meat. This would not be easily chewed on but chew I would and I intuitively knew of the correctness for me of Daimon's view . Jung apparently had arrived at a very similar understanding (see his book, Answer To Job).

I also knew what I had already concluded but had hestitated to admit that my difficult tumultuous and intellectually self-annihilating tenure in the New Age/New Thought/Sethian "create your own reality" movement was finished. Beyond done after too many years of staying too long at the New Age fair which had long worn thinner than it already is, hanging out too long their in spite of intuitive intellectual misgivings and dissatisfactions regarding the New Age's view of evil, merely a lack or lessening of good, I with Daimon's push allowed myself to think the much dreaded impermissible thought.

I have yet to assimilate Daimon's wisdom on the above but this is my personal meat and drink, my ongoing life task to work till the end of my days (See Canto Three below). For me there is a requisite conscious return to the cave, the depths, the chthonic, an open-eyed descent into the underworld, the nether places where Daimon has hurled angrily at the sealed gate keeping him in the dark carrying all our disowned and projected darkness in our Icarus-Angel flight into the Sun trying to obliterate our Night-selves.


"Teeth, In This Case, Is The Beginning Of Wisdom"

Several of James Hillman's books, Dreams and the Underworld, and Healing Fiction, especially chapter two, "The Pandaemonium of Images, Jung's Contribution to Know Thyself, deliciously explores the dimmed yet dynamic dimensions of the Nightworld, the mythic unconscious where upon entering there, says Hillman, human Dayworld values must be left behind. In the Nightworld, in Dreamtime, in the Unconscious, the world of daimons and more, one enters often kicking and screaming or-- dangerously to self and others--New-Age naively, to encounter a more accurate and politically-incorrect-to-the-ego-and-dayworld-values view of what individuals and collectives really are like. Because, according to Carl Jung, dreams are ruthless, "impartial facts" from the objective psyche many people resist them knowing that if taken seriously their whole view of self, other and reality will be profoundly altered and not so readily wrestled into the ever narrowing corrals of (dis)positivity (as in dispose-tivity). Out of site in this case guarantees out-of-their-mind; even apparently "sane" and cool dimentias will out, the nightworld, the daimonic will out by any means necessary and cares not a hoot whether one smells of light and sandalwood or is yogically stretched yet still karmically kvetched and shadow projected for the psyche, the daimonic eventually, finally-had-enough, turns like the proverbial whipped dog and bites. And such biting increases the possibility of wholeness, real wholeness, if one does not turn away from teeth. Teeth, in this case, is the beginning of wisdom.


In Michael Eigen's immensely wise and helpful book, The Psychoanalytic Mystic, in a section describing the function of faith in psychoanalysis and therapy work he speaks of "the explosive or catastrophic potential in every therapeutic encounter" (page 124). This is certainly so in any encounter with the daimon. Therapeutic work implies the goal of becoming conscious and making consciousness, thus a conscious explosive/catastrophic encounter with the daimon is an inevitable arrival in good, and extremely patient, therapy. Eigen describes William Blake's Heaven, a similar description which my daimon depicts of Hell as does Hillman in his book on the underworld, "William Blake describes heaven as all out war between every human capacity in which all have their say without compromise yet incessantly enrich and are enriched by others. Here faith functions as a boundless or infinite container (pages 124/125)."

The Demonic In Groups When The Rejected And Projected Daimonic Raises Its Head

I have without exception personally repeatedly found that "containment" in overtly identified-as-spiritual groups to be the exact opposite of Blake's description. The so-called "spirituality of the "spiritual group" and it's leader demand an absolute merger usually with the leader and her agenda on the leader's and the merged-with-the-leader, obedient group's terms. If one begins to e-merge and individuate from that leader and her group then an e-mergency ensues where usually one is identified as a kind of virus, a faction, and is thus scapegoated and run out, excommunicated or fired. The pathological narcissism of the powerful charismatic leader or leaders are daimon-identified (meaning mugged by the daimonic and thus are unconsciously acting inflatedly demon-maniacal). Being unconscious of one's daimon and of a group daimon makes all vulnerable to powerful, numinous upsurges of the daimonic. There is indeed an archetypal energy afoot but not necessarily all-good and "spiritual". The leader appears to be all-good and to do everything, even process, the received "right way" but without authentic recognition of shadow the followers and underlings in the group are assigned the task of carrying the shadow of the leader who usually can find no shadow in themselves when inevitably there begins to be "trouble in her paradise." This inability to find the shadow is willful, extremely toxic and pathological. And, maddeningly, the leader or leader- identified group experiences her/itself as victims of that one, carrying, often naming the shadow, emerging from the group trance and individuating away from it.

Heaven or Hell or, rather, Heaven and Hell--for there is not one without the other--divine warfare between human capacities as well as transpersonal powers vie for conscious attention and relating to within the individual and the group. Humans, flawed as we are, have the very slow yet gradually growing capacity for consciousness which is within and partakes of "a boundless or infinite container," the Self, Atman, or any number of words attempting to approach this mysterious yet palpable, experiencable even though unnameble hold. I stress the need for the ego here in this operation, this alchemical operation, this warfare of human capacities "which enrich and are enriched by others." Thus the essential importance of recognizing one's daimon and working with it. And acknowledging that it is and will ongoingly be very messy so let us not sanctify "cleanliness" especially in psychological soul work no matter where one is forced by the daimon to do it.

Psychology has an ongoing fantasy (and by fantasy I mean a very real image moving up from the very real psyche into the imagination of an individual and group) of "integration" of part-selves, daimons, shadow, personal history, historical events, personal, collective and transpersonal powers. Some integration is possible but it never ever complete. Our capacity to dream and in dreaming encounter the nightworld reveals an intrinsic faith in the Psyche and, weakly, in ourselves of a boundless, infinite container which holds heaven and hell dimensions in expressions of external and internal existence.

New Age spirituality and pseudo-psychology, most historical religions and some cosmologies oriented toward transcendence reinforce the split in humans between these heaven and hell dimensions. "A boundless or infinite container" holds, endures and cooks (in alchemy the cooking vessel is hermetically sealed and firm) both dimensions (the opposites) and from that intense and searing conflict consciousness grows. The human being contains and is the vessel of this divine conflict enduring, tolerating, at least trying to, the intolerable stuff of self and Other/other. The fantasy of tolerance, too, though ideal, is inimical to material existence which is born and fabricated of and from conflict. Realistically, humans can barely tolerate themselves much less the other but, and I take the following after W.R Bion and Eigen here as an object of faith) there is a boundless, infinite container to and within which I can only bow to and be grateful for for I am an often intolerable mess of warring capacities and contradictions ala Hillman as it is the very nature of the soul, says he, to pathologize .

All this one endures or must try to endure. When wide awake to the fact that the soul pathologizes one is humbled and liberated all at once to live more freely one's creaturely instinctual self less addicted to transcendence becoming more embracing of the givens of human existence, more embracing of the noble and tragic creatures we humans really are. As Ernest Becker accurately says in his always astounding book, The Denial of Death, we are creatures who cannot get over the fact that we are [conscious, creative] "gods who shit!"

W.R. Bion says that the tragedy (and hope) is that humans are creatures--who have indeed evolved up from animal consciousness enough to intuit/know where it appears we may be going but our bodies and nervous systems and psyches--haven't evolved enough yet to handle the tremendous animal drives which still demand and command us all the time. Ken Wilber accurately calls this our present Centauric condition, our being at the centauric level of consciousness, half animal/instinct/unconscious and half human/rational-creative/conscious. We are awake now to both and must endure as best we can the conflict of these opposites that we are. I take comfort here in Gabriel Marcel's homo viator to soften Bion's, I believe, accurate assessment of the human species; we are, as Marcel has it, viator, humans-on-the-way, still evolving or, as centaurs, still trotting along.

With Becker's insight in mind, any inflation humans have is confronted by this insult of being "gods who shit". To think we are gods is to be inflated and thus to be gods who shit, says Becker, comes as a shock to our nervous system and its conscious dreaming of itself as humans. However, I find that the dream of the infinite, boundless container is an image of the alchemical container mentioned above in which the prima materia, the primal stuff, the "shit" begins to be cooked and ultimately, so the alchemical fantasy goes, is transformed into gold which signifies greatest value (which is an ever expanding hold which includes and does not exclude shit). Jung's discovery of alchemical symbolism in psychotherapeutic containers helps us, gives us faith in transformation into fuller humanity and creaturehood more consciously containing, tolerating and incarnating archetypal forces. Perhaps that which is most transforming is the growing awareness of the infinite boundless unbreakable container which holds the heaven/hell of Nature and Consciousness, of warring human nature within and without. An intuition of, an experience of, the cosmic hold is transformational indeed and reinforces faith in not only the value implicit in the very struggle to endure much less transform but in very existence as it is itself. Eigen says, "All (warring) capacities find their place within a primary faith."

I call this primary faith animal faith, the kind of faith that the animal has, say, when after the lion has hauled down one of its own; the herd just a few feet away from the mauling munching lion bends their heads back to the grasses to also feed life. That bending to the grass is the statement of faith: "Not today, Death. I live and eat. And shit. And I run when I must." Animal faith assumes, contains, that facticity that life/death goes on. Creation and creatures continue. All are contained in the boundless, infinite container which is not static but alive Itself, ever forming from universal material givens.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

The More Insistent Voice --Notes on Addiction and Encounter For the Addictions Workshops, May 2009


["Couple - Tlaxcala Capilla Plaza 2008", Tlaxcala, Mexico. Oil paint effect application. Photo by Warren Falcon. Click on photo to enlarge.]

PLEASE NOTE that the addictions conference referred to here and in the June 2009 Learning For Life Group Newsletter is NOT a Fordham University conference but the NYC NASW Addictions Institute, that happens to be held at Fordham University. Outside of provision of the space, Fordham has nothing to do with the conference.

******************************************************

"It has been found again!

What?

Eternity.

It is the sea mingled with the sun"
-- from "Alchemy of the Word", Artur Rimbaud, A Season in Hell
(Oliver Bernard's translation).


Like a good Zen student Mephistopheles
says, "Myself am hell."
So all the old accounts are mistaken.
We need to translate,
the meanings are turned around:
for his screams read, "Delight,"
and for the tortures he undergoes,
read, "he does not shut out
any part of himself."
--
from "Spell To Be Chanted While Dispelling Loneliness," John Tarrant,
Beneath a Single Moon: Buddhism in Contemporary American Poetry
,
Kent Johnson, Craig Paulenich Editors, 1989, pg. 310,


"In the deepest sense we all dream not of ourselves, but out of what lies between us and the other."
-- pg. 173, Jung Letters, Vol. 1, C.G. Jung, Princeton University Press, 1973


I have occasionally described my standpoint to my friends as the "narrow ridge,"’ writes Buber. ‘I wanted by this to express that I did not rest on the broad upland of a system that includes a series of sure statements about the absolute, but on a narrow rocky ridge between the gulfs where there is no sureness of expressible knowledge but the certainty of meeting what remains undisclosed.’ (Martin Buber, Between Man and Man, trans. by Ronald Gregor Smith [London: Kegan Paul, 1947] p.184). Perhaps no other phrase so aptly characterizes the quality and significance of Martin Buber’s life and thought as this one of the ‘narrow ridge.’ It expresses not only the ‘holy insecurity’ of his existentialist philosophy but also the ‘I-Thou,’ or dialogical, philosophy which he has formulated as a genuine third alternative to the insistent either-or’s of our age. Buber’s ‘narrow ridge’ is no ‘happy middle’ which ignores the reality of paradox and contradiction in order to escape from the suffering they produce. It is rather a paradoxical unity of what one usually understands only as alternatives -- I and Thou, love and justice, dependence and freedom, the love of God and the fear of God, passion and direction, good and evil, unity and duality.
"
-- from Martin Buber: The Life of Dialogue by Maurice S. Friedman (online book: http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=459&C=371)


"The narrow ridge is the place where I and Thou meet," he [Buber] added. When I asked him to clarify this symbolism to me, he replied...'If you like, you can think of the narrow ridge as a region within yourself where you cannot be touched. Because there you have found yourself: and so you are not vulnerable."

"I have already said that every Thou in our life is doomed to become and It, a thing. The man or Woman whom we love, whom we seek to fulfil totally, becomes a given imperfect person with a known nature and quality. A young medical student dreams passionately of curing suffering humanity. Then he becomes a doctor in a crowded hospital with pressure, with not enough time to devote to every patient. And the suffering humans become objects. They recede to the world of the It. This is the tragedy of being human. And in order to avoid losing the I-Thou we must take our stand on the narrow ridge, as a company of soldiers takes up its position on an embattled hill and says, From here we shall not retreat!"

"And, as you have asked me for a clearer definition, I will say, the narrow ridge is the meeting place of the We. This is where man can meet man in community. And only men are who are capable of truly saying "Thou" to another can truly say "We" with one another. If each guards the narrow ridge within himself and keeps it intact, this meeting can take place."
-- pg. 69-70, from Encounter With Martin Buber, by Aubrey Hodes, Penguin Books, 1972


Michael Eigen recounts:

"I saw Martin Buber speak in a big synagogue...I don't remember much about what he said...But I was fascinated by the way Buber spoke. Too mannered, perhaps, but entrancing -- the way he lowered his head into his arms after saying something, waiting for the next revelation. He took time between utterances, time to pause, to listen. For Buber, speaking was a way of listening. Shema Yisroael: "Hear, Israel." Buber heard, and when he heard, we heard. By speaking, Buber was teaching listening...For Buber, listening was electrifying. There was rest, quiet, pause between, but expect to be burnt by the tongue's fire...Buber's death between utterances was anticipatory. One emptied in order to be ready for the next Thou surge, from moment of meeting to moment of meeting, waves of impact...Emptiness and I-Thou moment of impact. We thrive on both. We need more than one breast, more than one eye."
-- pg. 154, The Psychoanalytic Mystic, Michael Eigen, Esf Publishers, 1998


******************************************************


From my personal NYC NASW Addictions Institute workshop notes (many beginnings, many options for beginnings with moving tenses, past and futurity) :

Ultimate question (since questions are orienting, orientations, they orient awareness, point/hint/guide/infer) :

What is "the say" in addiction? What is the declaration? the utterance?


In the most recent annual NYC NASW Addictions Institute the theme of the conference was "The Tie That Binds". The Learning For Life Group faculty taught two workshops that day, the morning workshop being a presentation of the intentional dialogue as taught by Harville Hendrix and Helen McKelly Hunt who developed Imago therapy, a therapy designed for couples and others in need of effective communication skills and strategies for hearing and perceiving each other and in so doing resolving or tolerating differences and individuality. The afternoon workshop was on "The Tie That Unbinds--Scapegoating and Addictions."

I opened the morning session by setting the tone for the workshop on intentional dialogue and its effectiveness for working with addicts and their families. In the afternoon workshop I spoke of the history of the scapegoat religious ritual and some of its permutations as an unconscious but ongoing ritual in groups and amongst individuals. I spoke some of the psychological dynamics of scapegoating -- projections, recollection, integation, revaluation/redemption. I used my scapegoat article in the LFLG September 2008 issue as my text for the historical setting of scapegoating (click here to read that essay: http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/261056/f9a90b25d3/1357000208/64e097a070/.

What follows are some of my rough notes which I drew upon for both workshops as well as some of the texts I read which set the tone of my presentation as well as informed and amplified my suppositions, surmises, and blind alleyed saunters and speculations. Please note, too, that all etymology of words is taken from this website: www.etymonline.com.

The notes contain repetitions as is the nature of note taking...repetition, too, is a means of learning and underscoring points...and as Milton Erickson, master hypnotherapist, says, "The unconscious can enjoy repetition..."

Thus the first of many repetitions is excerpted from below as it is from whence I take the title of my essay for the latest Learning For Life Group newsletter and this current offering on the blogspot extention:

Addiction- The More Insistent Voice, The Shout, The Scream to know and to be known, to perceive and to be perceived. "To be is to be perceived," says a pragmatist philosopher...and yet to be perceived can also be annihilating, fragmenting, destroying. The archetypal "eye of God," both aspects of it, the all-seeing and all-loving, compassionate eye, the Jesus-eye, the Bodhisatva-eye; and the seering, severe, burning, dissecting, judging eye...we are ambivalent toward being perceived, long for it as much as fear and shun and hide from it...contrary selves and oppositions, awareness of shadow and embrace of shadow...what kind of embrace? that of, say, Buddha wrestling for seven years beneath the Bodhi tree; that of Jesus overturning merchant tables in the synagogue or sweating drops of blood in Gethsemani, etc....one's animal self, instinctual self, too, is to be encountered on the narrow ridge, all held there in the durable, expansive, apparently boundless space which does not reject any part of itself, of existence, of even the other's existence as forbidden from the narrow ridge. Shadow, sin, brokeness is incorporated, tolerated, possibly even celebrated though super-egoic calibrations' turn toward ethics and morality regarding self and other. Eigen speaks of William Blake's notion of heaven "as all out war between every human capacity in which all have their say without compromise, yet incessantly enrich and are enriched by others. Here faith functions as a boundless or infinite container." pg. 124-125 PA/Mystic.

And thus I repeat, also, by republishing a prologue already published in an earlier blogspot essay on addictions (http://falconwarren.blogspot.com/2008/06/guess-whos-coming-to-dinner.html). Anticipating notes ahead below about Narcissus and Echo I succumb to echolalia and repeat myself but with purpose :

In approaching addictions, let us remove our shoes. Our feet may be burned, but this burning may return us toward some awareness of where we are not, what we have lost, what we seek to gain in gaining not only the bliss promised in the addiction but also the Dis within it, the Roman name for Hell, (dis-, a prefix meaning 1."lack of, not" (e.g. dishonest); 2."do the opposite of" (e.g. disallow); 3."apart, away" (e.g. discard)). Moses saw a traumatizing burning bush and was disfigured, refigured and transfigured from such seeing. Job hallucinated in his derangement of massive loss, grief, and illness a Behemoth God who sought to be withstood and contained in human perception, his consciousness having to contain this Dis side of the Deity and not be destroyed. He was altered in the beholding of this dark aspect of the deity, and so was the deity. A daimonic dialogue consciously made humbles that one who must behold such traumatizing vision. But even in this vision some arrangement, some order, some transmutation, transformation is sought by Dis itself. It is not rehabilitiated nor sanctified. It is made conscious, and consciousness does this thing to all that it turns its attention to. Renewal? Not necessarily, but It has a conscious place at the table, and that rearranges the meal. One can imagine the table talk to be had.


******************************************************



Table Talk, Above and Below,
Servers Within Ear Shot



Initial dream/hope for notes for the workshops:

Ah! I am so forsaken I will worship at any shrine impulses toward perfection.
-- Artur Rimbaud, from The Drunken Boat

My first and guiding presuppostition when a potential client with addiction(s) issues comes to me for counsel (actually this is presumed for all my clients) is that the client has an as yet to be made conscious capacity for a profound relationship to Life and Life Force/Sources (in Jungian terms, the Archetypal Energies/Realms). Some would call this God (Carl Jung calls it the Self as opposed to ego) or many names used to reference a Greater Reality, a Richer, Deeper Awareness and Experience of Existence/Being. Knowing that all addictions contain a sacred or depth dimension of psyche/soul I know that part of our work together will be, at the client's pace, of course, making conscious the telos or purpose hidden unconsciously in the addictive drive and behavior. The Greek word, telios, is also the word for perfection, which, as I'll repeat in these notes and in my workshops, is not the idea of purity, white light and uncontaminated-by- instincts-embodiedment (which is impossible) but is the idea of developing, evolving, maturing, ripening in consciousness from experience in space and time. Basho, the quintessential Haiku poet of the 17th century with monkish/acetic (i.e. perfectionist) leanings once wisely wrote, "I would be a monk but for the dust of the world upon my shoulders." One translator wrote, "but for the dusty world on my shoulders." Two important experiences in each translator's choices; the first indicating the dirtiness of the poet, he is dirty with and as the world, the second conveying that he is carrying the dirty, dusty world upon his shoulders. Both convey the human experience of dirtiness and the burden of the dirty world we carry.

To sum and to plumb ahead, initially, dizzily : Addicts are deeply, richly capable of depth dimensions of life experience, are capable of conscious reconnection to psyche/soul-in-life inwardly and outwardly. Their unique expression of this soulful and soul/depth/consciousness evolving encounter is not dependent on social strata, status, economy, heritage, race, gender, etc. Every individual cultivates consciously and unconsciously embodied soulfulness. Part of the etymology of addict means deliver, yield, devote. Devotion is an innate drive within humanity and it is expressed unconsciously and consciously. Devotion is not dependent upon particulars of religions and spiritual traditions alone which have evolved since homo sapiens became self-reflectively conscious. Devotion extends to all things in all realms or spectrums of consciousness. Addictions contain devotions/drives toward telos, completion, wholeness (a spacious, non-rejecting HOLDness of ALL aspects of self and other, of Existenz...thus my quote of John Tarrant's poem above -- "he does not shut out any part of himself" which is as good a definition of wholeness as any I've ever encountered), ripeness, maturity.

"To shut out" is to alienate, to estrange parts from self. This anticipates my notes on Tillich and Buber, estrangement and alienation from self, from Other, and from Dynamic Ground (Tao, God, First Cause, Atman, etc.).


For both workshops I will use Bodes quote on Buber explaining "the narrow ridge", then Eigen re: Buber on speaking/listening...do some etymology, as usual...include a Tillich quote re: 2 ways of approaching God which I say applies also to approaching humans. The main themes are estrangement and alienation, how to meet on the narrow ridge in authentic human encounter in "holy insecurity" (a la Buber) which paradoxically is established in authentic personhood (NOT sainthood), consciously shadow aware and working it, full instinctual humanity present and accounted for. Estrangement from the body/instincts, post-Christianity, post-acetic Hindu/Buddhism/New-Age-"namaste-ole/au-lait" tendencies needs an I and Thou application, as well.

But first, the etymology of the work etymology: from Gk. etymologia, from etymon "true sense" (neut. of etymos "true," related to eteos "true") + logos "word." In classical times, of meanings; later, of histories.

For workshop about the technique of intentional dialogue and addictions I'll utilize and amplify via the above quotes and my notes one of the essential meanings found in the etymology of the word addict since it literally addresses the realm of speaking. I want to repeatedly underscore this:

from L. addictus, pp. of addicere from ad- "to" + dicere "say, declare".

In addiction, therefore, something/someone is "having a say", something/someone is "making a declaration".

What is "the say" in the addiction?
What is the declaration? the utterance?
What wants to, insists upon being said?


A point to hammer:



"The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard...More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in Thy sight...
-- from Psalm 19, King James Bible

"Night unto night sheweth knowledge"...which I take here to indicate the unconscious as the source of knowledge, of wisdom...day speech and night knowledge are sufficient dependencies...one must see the "glory"(etymology in part means opinion, also expectation) in the unconscious--the night realm's opinions and expectations sans day realms morality and law--in instincts, body impulses, images, dreams, symbols, symptoms, the etymology of which is from syn- "together" + piptein "to fall," from PIE base *pet- "to rush, to fly". Addiction as symptom which says, speaks, declares and sheweth/shows/indicates/points/hints, falls together, flies together, rushes together opinions/expectations of the unconscious which seeks balance, law of compensation, that which is in the conscious has its counterpart in the unconscious and vice versa. The "heavens" which declare the glory/opinion/expectation, these heavens are an image of depth, as in deep space, alluding to the depth dimensions of the unconscious...addictions are a falling together while breaking apart the ego...one thinks of Narcissus falling into the pool in order to be together with the image/imago he fell in love with reflected/mirrored there. He did not know himself. Narcissus the name is cognate with the word narcosis, narcotic which etymologically in Greek. narke means "numbness".

Addiction as symptom -- keep the etymology of both in mind as you read Edward Edinger here re: the myth of Narcissus' depth psychological meaning which by word etymology association deepens understanding of addiction:

"...The myth of Narcissus implies something quite different from an excess of indulgent self-love. Narcissus was a youth who rejected all suitors for his love. In reprisal, Nemesis arranged for him to fall in love with his own rejected image in a pool and he died in despair at nto being able to possess the object of his love."

"Narcissus represents the alienated ego that cannot love, that is, cannot give interest and libido to life--because it is not yet related to itself. To fall in love with the reflected image of oneself can only mean that one does not yet possess oneself. Narcissus yearns to unite with himself just because he is alienated from his own being. As Plato expressed in the Symposium, we love and yearn for what we lack. Narcissism in its original mythological implications is thus not a needless excess of self-love but rather just the opposite, a frustrated state of yearning for a self-possession which does not yet exist. The solution of the problem of Narcissus is the fufillment of self-love rather than its renunciation. We meet here a common error of the moralizing ego which tries to create a loving personality by extirpating self-love. This is a profound psychological mistake and only causes a psychic split. Fulfilled self-love is a prerequisite to the genuine love of any object, and to the flow of psychic energy in general."

"In the case of Narcissus, fulfillment of self-love, or union with the image of the depths, requires a descent into the unconscious, a nekyia or symbolic deasth. That this is the deeper meaning of the Narcissus myth is indicated by certaina other details. After Narcissus died he turned into the flower narcissus. This is the "death flower" (from narkao, to be stiff or dead). The narissus was sacred to Hades and opened the doors to his realm of the underworld...The inescapable conclusion is that narcissism, at least in its original mythological sense, is the way into the unconsciuos where one must go in quest of individuality." -- pgs. 161-162, Ego and Archetype, Edward Edinger, Penguin Press, 1973.

Another facet of the myth of Narcissus which relates to the mirroring which is basic to intentional dialogue is just that, mirroring, reflecting. Narcissus sees his reflected image in the mirror of the pool's surface. He had never seen himself. Mirroring, good mirroring helps us to see ourselves. Echo, a nymph also in love with Narcissus, also hints to the wounding and healing/wholing of Narcissus. Echo is a verbal mirroring of what is sounded, said, declared. Intentional dialogue is feelingly echoing the other who speaks themselves to another. A mirror shows. An utterance is echoed. A self perceives itself in the gaze and echo of the reflective, inflective other...

Utterance and showing, uttereth and sheweth --
Speech and image, speaking and demonstration/follow through,
depiction, speech acts, speaking as act, as commitment,
as making commitment followed by sheweth,
showing by action/demonstration.


My premise is that of Carl Jung's and of Alcoholics Anonymous, that there is an unconscious, yet to be made conscious, sacrality/religious function in the addiction, in the addict's repetitive (perverse yet hinting) pattern/behavior. Repetition compulsion. The compulsions which drive addictions have a religious (again, etymology is re-linking, re-connecting, binding back, rebinding, rebonding, the tie that binds) dimension seeking to reconnect, to bond the addict back to essential rejuvenating Forces and Sources, both personal and transpersonal (it's never either/or but a matter of emphasis in the course of therapy/counseling). The say, the declaration in addiction, yet to be made conscious, is what I call the More Insistent Voice, the Shout, the Scream, the Prayer (Diane Shainberg would ask a client, "What is the prayer in your suffering?") to know and be known, to be perceived, to be encountered authentically in such a way as to encounter one's essential (e-sin-tial) nature as it is. It is not a stretch to think of addiction in these terms since the very root meaning of the word addict relates to utterance/speech:

Important point to make about sacrality and the sacred -- distinguishing from the popular New Age sentiment (and the New Age is mostly sentimentality) of the sacred consisting only of white light, purity, stasis/stillness...this is also found in Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, and other religions, an acetic ideal of purity devoid of instinct, animal, nature...the way Jung uses sacred and sacrality includes the discarded, judged, shunned chthonic and numinous (meaning fraught with sacrality) shadow, the full spectrum of light from the subtle to the primary colors/emotions/viscera of existence, i.e. instincts, aggression, sexuality, shit, piss, puss, the dark, decaying, the so-called pathological, the "not spiritual"...

[As I transcribe these notes a song plays from the sudden synchronistic cyber-jukebox, "The Water Is Wide":

The water is wide, I cannot cross o'er,
But Neither have I the wings to fly.
Give me a boat, that can carry two,
And both shall row, my love and I.
I leaned my back up against an oak
I thought it was a trusty tree
but first it bend and then it broke
And so my love did unto me.
A ship there is and she sails the sea,
She's loaded deep as deep can be,
But not so deep as the love I'm in
I know not if I sink or swim.
O love is handsome and love is fine
And love's a jewel when it is new
but love grows old and waxes cold
And fades away like morning dew.]

Paul Tillich, existentialist Protestant theologian of the last century exiled to American from Germany as Other by the Nazi regime, speaks of "the Other as destiny"which strikes me as a given of human existence--at birth the infant is "one with everything, with the Maternal-Sempiternal ( (13c.) or L.L. sempiternalis, from L. sempiternus, from L. semper "always" (see semper-) + æternus "eternal"), with the Unconscious." At conception, at birth, one is destined to become a separate self as one becomes aware she/he is not the mother/other. This IS all our destiny. Most creation myths depict an identification with the Original Wholeness and then a separation, an awakening consciousness which breaks that participation mystique--a term derived from anthropology and the study of primitive psychology--denoting a mystical connection, or identity between subject and object, leading to separation and exile, wandering in hope of return to Original Wholeness. To return unconsciously is regressive but to return consciously is progressive which leads to ongoing creation of consciousness where one leaves identity with the Edenic Marternal Garden and participates in the conscious creation/building of the Kingdom of "God".

With ego awareness, with a self, we become aware of the Other, of ourselves as distinct from Other, that we are this destiny of separateness, of alienation, estrangement. Albert Camus, blessed be he, writes eloquently of "L'Estrangement". Thus all the more profound is Tillich's philosophical theology of encountering god and self as Stranger and as the possibility of (it is not a given for every human) overcoming estrangement (I understand 'overcoming' not as "getting over" but as tolerating the dynamic tension in self and other without resorting to the transcendent defense of "we are all one" even though we share univseral, rather, archetypal patterns experienced uniquely as individuals. The irony or paradox in the word individual is that it means undivided; read Edward Edinger here:

"The word individual is etymologically related to the word widow. According to Skeat, widow (Latin, vidua) derives from a lost cognate verb videre, meaning to part. Jung has demonstrated that the images of widow and orphan are part of the individuation process...Widow means the parted one. Hence, prior to widowhood one is not yet an individual, indivisible [which is what the word individual means, in = not, and dividere= to divide, thus not divided], but is still subject to the parting process. The symbolism tells us that widowhood is an experience on the pathway to the realization of individuality, in fact, that individuality is the son of that experience. This can only mean that man must be parted from that on which he is dependent but which he is not, before he can become aware of that which he is, unique and individual. A dependent projection must be broken. Similar implications apply to the image of the orphan which was a synonym for the alchemists' philosophers' stone. To be orphaned denotes the loss of parental support and the breaking of parental projections; it is likewise a prerequisite of the conscious experience of individuality. As Augustine puts it, to be a widow or orphan relates one to God (the Self)." pgs. 162-163, Ego and Archetype, Edward Edinger, Penguin Press, 1973

As Edinger says it, to reiterate, the widow and orphan, strangers all, others, relate one to God (the Self). This sets up more of Tillich's insight into the human experience of God and other. He says that there are two ways of approaching God and I'd like to extend this to include two ways of approaching the person, the other :

"The way of overcoming estrangement and the way of meeting a stranger. In the first way man discovers himself when he discovers God [and the other person], he discovers something that is identical with himself although it transcends him infinitely, something from which he is estranged, but from which he has never been and never can be separated. In the second way man meets a stranger when he meets God [or the other person]. The meeting is accidental. Essentially they do not belong to each other. They may become friends on a tentative and conjectural basis. But there is no certainty about the stranger man has met." pg. 10, The Theology of Culture, Paul Tillich, Oxford University Press, 1959.

1) Overcoming estrangement -- rediscovering of esse, essence which is another name for wholeness which etymologically means completeness, ripeness, maturity...telios, greek word for perfection also means 'purpose'...thus evolution, development is implied in the words wholeness, perfection, completeness...Rimbaud, then, cries out that in his forsakeness (alienation/estrangement) he will worship at any shrine impulses toward development/evolving maturity, ripeness. Worship then, too, is a procession.

2) Stranger - the way of meeting a stranger...the child has stranger anxiety, fear of the other...

The Other as Destiny. The Stranger as Destiny. Estrangement as Destiny and the quest to be known and embraced.

Alienation -- in the Western creation myth God and man become strangers and humans are exiled, estranged, alienated while bearing within them the Imago of God, a memory, an imprint, now a scar which is the memory of original wholeness and unity with God...the alienation self with Self, of self with self, of self with other, with self-as-Other...


Western religion is about encounter, the Word, Logos, dialogue from O.Fr. dialoge, from L. dialogus, from Gk. dialogos, related to dialogesthai "converse," from dia- "across" + legein "speak". Thus to dialogue is to speak across as well as the indicative cross speak, to cross words, to speak cross words as well as to speak in order to cross the divide which is now the appropriate time to read of Martin Buber's "the narrow ridge" (see quotes above).


Intentional dialogue is the primary technique of Imago Therapy as developed by Harville Hendrix and Helen LaKelly Hunt.

Helpful Etymology:

Intend - c. 1300, "direct one's attention to," from O.Fr. intendre "to direct one's attention," from L. intendere "turn one's attention, strain," lit. "stretch out, extend," from in- "toward" + tendere "to stretch". Sense of "have as a plan" (1390) was present in Latin. A Gmc. word for this was ettle, from O.N. ætla "to think, conjecture, propose," from P.Gmc. *ahta "consideration, attention" (cf. O.E. eaht, Ger. acht). Intended (n.) "one's intended husband or wife" is from 1767.
Intense - c. 1400, from M.Fr. intense, from L. intensus "stretched, strained, tight," originally pp. of intendere "to stretch out, strain"; thus, literally, "high-strung." Intensity formed in Eng. 1665 (earlier was intenseness, 1614); sense of "extreme depth of feeling" first recorded 1830. Intensify (1817) was first used by Coleridge, in place of intend, which was no longer felt as connected with intense.

Intent (adj.) - "very attentive," 1606, from L. intentus "attentive, eager, strained," pp. of intendere "to strain, stretch".

Intent (n.) - "purpose," c.1225, from O.Fr. entente, from L.L. intentus "attention," from L. intentus (fem. intentia), pp. of intendere "stretch out, lean toward, strain," lit. "stretched out" (see intend). Intentionally "on purpose" is from 1661.
Also interesting and appropriate to note that the word "moan" is etymologically related to intent as moaning is "complaint, lamentation," probably related to O.E. mænan "complain, moan," also "tell, intend," from P.Gmc. The intentional dialogue usually derives from the "complaint" in relationships, the moan - "long, low inarticulate murmur from some prolonged pain". You can't make this stuff up!! It is part of root meanings in words, in utterance, in addicere, the say, the declaration...

In the very phrase intentional dialogue is, rootly, tension, strain, being in tension, being strained, also, being restrained, restraining oneself (via the technique of mirroring, empathy, validation and accomodation via transformation).

To repeat, Dialogue - from O.Fr. dialoge, from L. dialogus, from Gk. dialogos, related to dialogesthai "converse," from dia- "across" + legein "speak" (see lecture).

Lecture - 1398, "action of reading, that which is read," from M.L. lectura "a reading, lecture," from L. lectus, pp. of legere "to read," originally "to gather, collect, pick out, choose" (cf. election), from PIE *leg- "to pick together, gather, collect" (cf. Gk. legein "to say, tell, speak, declare," originally, in Homer, "to pick out, select, collect, enumerate;" lexis "speech, diction;" logos "word, speech, thought, account;" L. lignum "wood, firewood," lit. “that which is gathered”). To read is to "pick out words." Meaning "action of reading (a lesson) aloud" is from 1526. That of "a discourse on a given subject before an audience for purposes of instruction" is from 1536. The verb is attested from 1590.

How often do people at odds lecture one another instead of converse, dialogue, or speak at cross purposes, speak crossly, speak across and over the other?

Etymology of the word Imago simply is image yet it's formal use conveys primary image or archetype or primary pattern akin to Plato's idea of the ideal forms. Jung speaks of mother imagos, father imagos and these indicate the mother and father archetypes.

Mike Eigen points out in The Psychoanalytic Mystic: "For Freud libido seeks an ideal imago [italics mine], in traditional terms, god."

So both Freud and Jung use imago to convey something more than just superficial visual image...whether Hendrix and Hunt intend to use the word imago the way Freud and Jung use it or not the etymological, therefore archetypal, root meaning of the word is present inherent within. Hendrix and Hunt do say that each member of a couple projects their inner personal parental imagos upon their partner and therefore expect them, consciously and unconsciously, to be like the parent for good and for ill and hope that the partner undoes and heals any wounding from original parents. No quarrel here. Jung would include that the archetypal Imagos are also evoked and projected upon the partner. Jung insists for individuation's sake that the individual projector become aware of these inner Imagos, the archetypal mother and father and others, develop a conscious relationship to those living internal realities, begin to withdraw their projections upon the partner and thus relieve the partner of the set up of the burden of expectations and failures that come from catching and perhaps nobly and willingly but ineffectively carrying archetypal projections. The partner is then free to be the utterly, always/already fallible human being in the room as opposed to "the Face that launched a thousand ships" or "the Great Mother" or "Great Father and King", the Prince, etc.

Plato speaks of the imago of the primal or original human, an archetypal image...from Edward F. Edinger's book, Ego and Archetype, Penguin Books, London, 1973 :

"In the Platonic myth of the whole human, the primal or original man, the anthropos, was round, in the shape of a mandala. In the Symposium Plato says, the primeval man was round, his back and sides forming a circle...due to childlike inflation the primal man offended the gods and was ripped literally in two and ever since humans have been seeking to be reunited." pg. 8

Thus this separation and longing (derived from the ripping in two) is the tension in the word intention which adds meaningful resonance to the phrase used in Imago therapy intentional dialogue. Out of oneness, separateness - and with separation comes consciousness, exile, and in exile the cultivation of consciousness driven by the longing for conscious return, reunion, the word conscious being most important for an unconscious return is regressive and addictive with no forward growth and evolution, no perfection which etymologically means complete, ripe, mature."

Imago - the root or archetypal image, call it Platonic form or ideal....

Imago is the source place/potential from which all images emerge which are referential to root energies/expressions/encounters which appear to us as literal images...image here, as opposed to imago, is referential to, partakes of, the root, archetypal Ground Dynamic but is not the entire Thing Itself (the Ground, the archetype)...for our and Hendrix's purposes the Imago is an archetype, an endless source or wellspring (to use some images here) from out of which the objects of our libido, and the images of them, have their appearance, appeal and attraction...refer again to the Platonic myth of the original round human in the shape of a mandala (a mandala is always a wholeness image)...

Edinger - "Dreams often attempt to heal the alienated ego by conveying to it some sense of origin." Ego and Archetype, pg. 117. Thus the dream of relationship of all kinds, the dream of/drive for return, for reunion, coniunctio, to a distant yet powerful meaning of origin and original unity to being itself, to esse, which includes "god reality", original face, oneness with the maternal unconscious, mother and child as one, father and child, mother and father and child as one...

Two people coming together create or evoke or discover and nurture a space which can hopefully hold the tension between space and time, being and existence, for to exist is to be in space and time which therefore means to be evidently divided, composed of opposites and pulled and pushed accordingly...and yet, Imago, the archetype of vast, flexible, enduring, containing space for relatedness is awakened which does not balk at or reject opposites as strangers (see Tillich notes above) but as unique expression of esse, of Being, as manifest expressions in space and time...Imago does not reject strangeness...

I'm trying to relate addiction as speech to intentional dialogue...and I do so, or try, poetically/mythopoetically as rooted in Primal Ground, Archetypal Space. I use psyche-logic (psyche means soul and the language of psyche/soul is image-inal, Imagos and images).

Images are inductions into open-ended experiences framed upon verbal, visual, emotional, kinesthetic and intuitive/aesthetic images/impressions evoking expressions...

Eigen in Psychoanalytic Mystic speaks of I-Thou and I-It mystical moments as turbulent:

"All real living is meeting." The self that enters an I-Thou relation is not the same as in an I-It relation. Oceanic fusion, absorption, or oneness would not do justice to the drama of self-other meeting and intersection that Buber points to. For one thing, the mystical moment may involve enormous upheaval, turbulence, overthrowing and reworking of self. A new meeting can change one's picture [image] of what self and other can be."

Jung speaks of the I and the Not-I...a way of speaking of I-Thou and I-It relations...his Not-I is not just the human and material other but that Self, that Encompassing Greater Reality Beyond Comprehension Yet Is Apprehended...

Addiction- The More Insistant Voice, The Shout, The Scream to know and to be known, to perceive and to be perceived. "To be is to be perceived," says a pragmatist philosopher...and yet to be perceived can also be annihilating, fragmenting, destroying. The archetypal "eye of God," both aspects of it, the all-seeing and all-loving, compassionate eye, the Jesus-eye, the Bodhisatva-eye; and the seering, severe, burning, dissecting, judging eye...we are ambivalent toward being perceived, long for it as much as fear and shun and hide from it...contrary selves and oppositions, awareness of shadow and embrace of shadow...what kind of embrace? that of, say, Buddha wrestling for seven years beneath the Bodhi tree; that of Jesus overturning merchant tables in the synagogue or sweating drops of blood in Gethsemani, etc....one's animal self, instinctual self, too, is to be encountered on the narrow ridge, all held there in the durable, expansive, apparently boundless space which does not reject any part of itself, of existence, of even the other's existence as forbidden from the narrow ridge. Shadow, sin, brokeness is incorporated, tolerated, possibly even celebrated though super-egoic calibrations' turn toward ethics and morality regarding self and other. Eigen speaks of William Blake's notion of heaven "as all out war between every human capacity in which all have their say without compromise, yet incessantly enrich and are enriched by others. Here faith functions as a boundless or infinite container." pg. 124-125 PA/Mystic.

Here we have two contradictory images -- the narrow ridge (I also love Eigen's "electrified tightrope" image as the narrow ridge) verses the boundless, infinite container. There is a tension here between the two images...another Eigen quote helps here:

"For Bion, faith creates the attitude that makes conflict between psychic dimensions more fruitful. In both Winnicott and Bion the structure of mystery exhibits a tension-in-unity which is dynamic...a necessary part of mystery and life." ibid. pg. 126. It strikes me that good relationship incorporates, tolerates, allows and insists upon this dynamic and necessary "tension-in-unity."

The longing to be perceived along with the terror of it...capacity to tolerate the stranger within and the stranger without...Intentional dialogue = ways to tolerate edges, as well. After all, a narrow ridge is an edge...In a poem Theodore Roethke speaks of edges and of growing darkness, edges and darkening have a relation...he says, "The night is what I have, a dear proximity." I translate or twist it here to, "The edge is what I have, a dear proximity." The stranger and the estranged is darkness, is an edge...gestalt psychology, Diane Shainberg, too, would call it, in potentia, the growing edge. The other, the partner, the dialogic other we are in tension with is what we have, and in potentia (poet-encia), a dear proximity, a dear closeness though it is other, Thou and It..."Thing that have hands take hands," also says Roethke.

A-Dear-Proximity
in the context of addicere/addiction's "say, it's declaration", the Word, the Logos with it's Gnosis and Devotio is deeply religious -- Repeating Eigen repeating Freud, it is Libido's insistent drive toward "an ideal imago", in a word, God", or that which the God word, name or experience implies.

Roethke again:

Ye littles, lie close. Make me, O Lord, a last, a simple thing Time cannot overwhelm. Once I knew time, a bud broke to a rose and I rose from a last diminishing. -- from "In Evening Air"

Poetic preponderance May 25 --

"Estoy muy solitario...(I am very lonely)," says Victor, a young man from Mexico whom I met on a bus ride. He was newly in the US, without family or friends here, only a cousin in Boston, to seek work to earn enough money for his young sister's sinus surgery in Chiapas. A few weeks after we met, alone, not much money left to live on and with no job prospects he called me from Boston after midnight crying and afraid. We spoke where we had first met, upon "the narrow ridge". I hung up at the end of the call heart-broken for we had met broken heart to broken heart.

The story of how we met illustrates Tillich's two ways of meeting God, and as I apply it, of two ways of meeting a person, first as estrangement and then as a way of overcoming estrangement. It also illustrates how Victor and I met as Its and became Thous in the course of the 7 hour bus ride from New York City to Boston. I'll excerpt from an email to a friend about the encounter:

A few days ago I had an amazing encounter on the bus trip up from New York to Boston with a 20 years old Mexican immigrant kid literally just out from under the belly of the beast, an 18 wheeler Mac-truck, in which he had been crammed and cramped with 3 other compadres crossing the border into the US for 6 days, hot from the engine, unable to get out to walk, piss, shoit...when I first sat beside him on the bus he looked absolutely frightened and trembled...I eventually spoke to him, he spoke no English, and he eventually began to tell me of his journey in the truck's bowels, of his little pueblo in the high hills of Chiapas (with only one phone for the whole village), one of the poorest and politically radical states of Mexico, his younger sister's need for a serious operation on her nose and sinuses costing $80,000 pesos ($8000 US dollar), which is why he took this hero's journey (my words for it) to the US with no English at all, very little $$, and a cousin in Boston hopefully waiting for him at the station.

I had a few Virgin of Guadalupe images I received from Bety in Oaxaca (a curandera/healing woman with whom I apprentice), told him I studied and practiced curandismo ala Bety and when I gave him a Guadelupe image, pointed to a red tailed hawk and a zopelote (turkey vulture in Nahuatl language) in the sky out our window, and told him the this was auspicious for him he crossed himself, kissed his lips, took my hand and cried. It was then I noticed that he had pissed himself while we were talking and had discreetly covered his lap with a plastic bag with some food and water in it. I didn't say anything to him about it but at some point I excused myself verbally from him indicating that I was going to the restroom at the back of the bus...either he didn't know it was there or he was afraid to venture forth from his seat due to no English language skills and fear of being discovered as an illegal alien. I brought him back some towelettes for washing, some paper towels, and told him the restroom had a lock on the door. Still, he did not venture to the restroom.

As we rode on and chatted he opened up some more and we talked about Mexico, my trips there and my eventual hopeful retirement to there, of his family, his new adventure in America and his hope to make the money for his sister's operation quickly so he could quickly return to his novia/fiance, Sandra, and his widowed mother and 2 sisters (his older and only brother was killed ten years ago in a construction accident when something fell and crushed his skull). I gave him my contact info if he wanted to keep in contact with me from Boston or when he returned to Chiapas.

He had visibly relaxed during our ongoing conversation but when we got to the bus station in Boston the cousin wasn't there and he looked frightened...I had an hour to wait there for the Portland bus so asked him if he had a phone number or an address of the cousin. "No." I was a bit shocked that he had just showed up at the station without any contact information. It was only later that I realized that this was for his cousin's safety and anonymity if the kid got arrested by the cops...there would be no trace to the cousin.

We strode toward the food area, Victor looking frightened and literally holding onto my arm...then his face lit up, he let go my arm and slowly walked toward a man in his 40's, his cousin, Aurelio. Both of us relieved, I shook his cousin's hand, then Valentin's, told him to call me when he got the chance and let me know how he is, etc. He gave me a warm embrace and told me that Dios has sent me to give him hope. I teared up a bit...just some simple kindness and contact was God. I went off to my McNugget's and bad coffee (my Boston bus station ritual). Victor and Aurelio walked past me not noticing me. I heard Valentin saying, "No. No, carnal ("blood brother" in Mexican Spanish). He speaks Spanish pretty good and is a curandero in New York," the older cousin looking concerned/dubious, wary, I'm sure, of gringo strangers, the immigration police...

This kid and his story sticks with me, of one who rides beneath a truck belly risking arrest and death, the journey undertaken to save his little sister...and perhaps a young man's daimon calling him into the underworld of border-crossings, that Hermes' realm of tricksters, thieves and guides, into the US for the hero's individuation journey...this kid, and the very many others coming here, is no It but a Thou. He is, indeed, an "esse", Mexican Spanish for "brother" which also means "to be", "being" in Latin, where the word essense is derived." END of email.


******************************************************



One's solitary journey alone as a stranger in and with the world-as-stranger, as other.

Is it, the world, a Thou for real?

"Every Thou is terrible!" to borrow and alter an expression of Rilke's from Duino Elegies (He writes, "Every Angel is terrible!")

To stand in and for Existenz as an appeal and as Existenz, too, one who is Existenz and who, too, is an appeal to the Thou of the universe, or universe-as-Thou, to be met...

There is an Emptiness, a kenosis (greek for emptying), and there is an infilling experienced either as being filled from without (by It or Thou) or from a Source (It/Thou) within -- or an awakening to Fullness-as-presense...Victor and I met in this way in his suffering and his primal faith that he could make it in the US.

One stands on the narrow ridge, lives there empty or full, as appeal, as response to appeal in an encounter or in the possibility of encounter. Samuel Beckett's Godot depicts this, it's setting is the narrow ridge and the action of the play, the characters, are appeal and response or attempts to respond in what the existentialists call "good faith".

Bion and Eigen write much of this continual dialectic of shattering and recollection where wholeness is a dynamic, non static state.

The existentialists speak of an appeal in existence for response, this call, this word, this speech, this guttural moan/utterance strains, stretches toward us creatures of response (and of appeal) which constitutes an encounter which re-constitutes some essential/existential sense in which the Universe knows itself through us essentially...thus our response, even a scream, is or lends or gives or hints at meaning.

Notations/half thoughts for future study:

Image as structure-structuring.
The constituting nature of the face.

Mirroring = Face to face

With Imago/intentional dialogue in mind reread/study the Eros and Psyche myth;
Reread Marie Louise von Franz's The Golden Ass and her book on Projection and Recollection for this is very much a part of the work on the narrow ridge (more on this below).

Face evokes primary structures within the human organism--instinctual, biological, archetypal, biochemical-- processes which evoke/provoke creative constituting forces.

Call and response.
The Expression which impacts, imparts, surges, caresses, fragments, parses, disintegrates...

"We arise as individuals, but we become as persons." -- from Martin Buber: The Life of Dialogue by Maurice S. Friedman (online book: http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=459&C=371)

The internet/cyberspace as "the pool of Narcissus"...

Perpetual estrangement...or more of that sense of self as an it, an other, than as a Thou...

One must also know one's "Other", one's shadow, positive and negative....

The containing Gaze, the Face, and what Henri Corbin calls "the Angel of the Face", the unique mediated Face of Esse (Being). In Mexico men refer affectionately to one another as "esse" which there means brother...the word, esse/being used to convey brother, thou...not other/it.

Regarding scapegoating and how to deal with it:

First of all know that it is a phenomena of projection. All projections must be reclaimed, recollected, then integrated...

Scapegoat as shadow catcher/carrier. A la Buber scapegoat is reduced to an It.

Basic (and base) Projection 101...von Franz says :

1) Projection is a preconscious, involuntary process, independent of consciousness...it is to be expected that the process itself will be depicted in products of the unconscious such as dreams, waking fantasies, and mythological traditions.

2) Whenever projection takes plae, there is first of all [and always] a "sender" and "a receiver".

For the Dreamwork Toolkit: One of the oldest ways of symbolizing projections is by means of projectiles, especially the magic arrow or shot that harms other people. When you encounter a dream with projectiles, guns, bullets, arrows, knives, stones, etc. think "projections".

Simple (but almost impossibly difficult to do) formula for working with scapegoating:

Name it ---> Claim it ---> Integrate/tame it

The AIM of scapegoating (projecting) is blame and shame and mame:

AIM ---> BLAME/SHAME/MAME.

As well as to redeem and cleanse the scapegoater(s):

Also part of the AIM ---> CLEANSE/REDEEM

To tame implies bringing into consciousness, making someone/something more conscious/aware.

One's own ongoing inner work is essential for tolerating the archetypal energies which get constellated in doing shadow/scapegoat work. It is essential to do this work yourself in order to assist others/addicts-as-scapegoats to tolerate the work.


WHAT FOLLOWS IS FROM LFLG NEWSLETTER AND FROM BLOGSPOT ESSAY. Click the following if you want to read both or either:

http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/261056/f9a90b25d3/1357000208/64e097a070/.

http://falconwarren.blogspot.com/2008_08_01_archive.html

...If one understands that it is archetypal libido that the scapegoat constellates (activates) and carries for others (unbidden carrying, mind you) then the scapegoat is darkly numinous because of that archetypal energy and projection. Consciously carrying it liberates, or can, the scapegoat while scapegoaters libel-ate, castigate (as in "casting stones"), pontificate and destroy/banish the goats. The scapegoat has power, great power archetypally, which is what evokes the scapegoating complex and dynamic. George Elder, Jungian analyst and author, told me this week that the goat is banished instead of killed in some of the rituals because there is an unconscious awareness that the energy the goat carries is sacred (archetypal) which cannot just vanish and is in fact "secretly" worshipped via compulsions which need ultimately to be brought consciously to the analytical/psychological table (another kind of altar)...As I write this an African Catholic bishop is talking about the ritual of the Devotion to Sacred Blood of Jesus, the Scapegoat Extraordinaire, whose blood is or can be a transforming "food" for the partaker and the god...you are fortunate to have such a wise priest who knows his Jung which is very surprising. Jung knew and experienced much scapegoating and does still posthumously. I'm proud and humble to be in his company...

...It's a two-way street re: scapegoating and the projections and counter-projections that fly fast and furious and oh so righteously but I believe the wise teacher and scapegoat Jesus of Nazareth cuts through all this when he counsels "to remove the log from your own eye before you seek to point out the splinter in the other's eye." Hard psychoanalytical work, that! Look to one's own shadow and embrace it, have a more conscious relationship to it and the projections of others (theoretically--I'm still a babe in the woods here) may then be meaningfully bourn. In so doing one may eventually mourn and bemoan less the loss of face and place as a hostilely encircled or banished-as-evil Loner for one is undergoing an intense process of individuation as Edward Edinger indicates so clearly and movingly in his profound book, Ego and Archetype, The Religious Function of the Psyche:

"The word individual is etymologically related to the word widow. According to Skeat, widow (Latin, vidua) derives from a lost cognate verb videre, meaning to part. Jung has demonstrated that the images of widow and orphan are part of the individuation process...Widow means the parted one. Hence, prior to widowhood one is not yet an individual, indivisible [which is what the word individual means, in = not, and dividere= to divide, thus not divided], but is still subject to the parting process. The symbolism tells us that widowhood is an experience on the pathway to the realization of individuality, in fact, that individuality is the son of that experience. This can only mean that man must be parted from that on which he is dependent but which he is not, before he can become aware of that which he is, unique and individual. A dependent projection must be broken. Similar implications apply to the image of the orphan which was a synonym for the alchemists' philosophers' stone. To be orphaned denotes the loss of parental support and the breaking of parental projections; it is likewise a prerequisite of the conscious experience of individuality. As Augustine puts it, to be a widow or orphan relates one to God (the Self)." pgs. 162-163


And to be a scapegoat also relates one to God (the Self).

These are powerful words in which I take great comfort...the meaning of an experience of scapegoating can be seen as an archetypal event which calls one to individuation as psychological scapegoat, orphan, widow, carriers of unintegrated 'gold' of the Self, that greater Center in each person. Dependent projections must be broken and are often shattering, thus the experience of abjection and desolation, of wandering disoriented in the wilderness as one undergoes a reorientation toward the Self and one's dependency upon It and nothing/no one else.

Scapegoating is a psychologically primitive yet effective orienting device where the scapegoater continually needs to scapegoat and sacrifice it. This unconsciously reorients him/her to the inner Center/Self which gets projected upon some other individual, group, community, nation. Personal and collective shadow gets constellated (activated) and projected upon the scapegoat who carries that shadow. Just to repeat, this projection by the scapegoater reorients him/her albeit unconsciously toward the Self which is projected outwardly upon an individual, group, collective, and the doctrines and mores of local god and tribe. Recognition and reclaiming of the projections (the "removing the log" work of Jesus) is the work, the life long work, most important and essential work, in the process of individuation.

Thus Jesus's words about removing the log from one's own eye cuts through the dependent projections when one enters the wilderness of introspection, Jungian analysis, other inner work and there confronts the shadow and the Self within. This makes one a (depth) psychological orphan, a widow, a scapegoat who is much needed collectively for they not only preserve the greater order of humans with the sacred (archetypal) but evolve collective human consciousness further, individual by individual.

It's a dirty job, baby, but somebody's gotta do it! Usually one doesn't know what one is signing up for when naively entering the Scapegoats-R-Us store which has many guises, a family, church, religious/spiritual growth group, seminary, government organization, a job and on and on in search of a cute stuffed lamb or goat. However, one is usually compelled in by Libido-as-Fate (the Daimon is that!) which drives the individuation process usually followed blindly until one has one's Damascus experience like St. Paul and is blinded by the Light of the Self as Transforming Fire, the Sol Niger/Black Sun which renders insight where one begins to ongoingly undergo meaningful suffering of psychological orphanhood, widowhood, goathood for the sake of individuation which is increased from these scapegoating experiences, or can be--not a formula here but an archetypal pattern of hope and possibility. Undergo, by the way, is what the word suffer means etymologically, i.e. sub= below, under, and ferrre= carry, go, )... Just read the myths, the experiences, say, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Jesus Christ, so many, so many, and so many unknown ones who have done the hard inner work of recognizing and withdrawing and chewing on the projections..

Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Mind Cure Movement or Too Much Of A Good Thing Verses Peaks & Vales & Prevailing Darkness


[My "altar", part of it, as it appeared when "Father Will" came for counseling. Photo by Michael G. Reed. Click to enlarge the image.]


Happy-minded Religion Verses Sick-Souled Religion


**********************************************


[These opening quotes are perhaps the most important texts of all to read for they "open the act", so to speak, and set the stage and tone for what follows. What lies beneath these beginnings humbly, too often dumbly, plods with apologies to these giants.]


Who would be half posessed by
his own nakedness?
Waking's my care--

I'll make a broken music, or I'll die.
-- Theodore Roethke, from "In Evening Air"


O the mind, mind has mountains; cliffs of fall
Frightful, sheer, no-man-fathomed. Hold them cheap
May who ne'er hung there. Nor does long our small
Durance deal with that steep or deep. Here! creep,
Wretch, under a comfort serves in a whirlwind: all
Life death does end and each day dies with sleep.
-- Gerard Manley Hopkins, from "No Worst, There is None"


About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters; how well, they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window
or just walking dully along...
--W.H. Auden, from "Musee des Beaux Arts"


Great Nature has another thing to do
To you and me: so take the lively air,
And, lovely, learn by going where to go...

What falls away is always. And is near.
--Theodore Roethke, from "The Waking"


Pathological happiness is a manic defense against depression and death, a denial of the realm of pathos or suffering, from which the word pathology is derived, the path or pattern of suffering in beingness. Great Nature runs riot upon and within that which we can project some thing called "happiness" ('happy', meaning 'happen, luck, an eventing') but without a doubt the crushing dissolution, the decay and ending is Nature's way, Her insistency, despite all our reification of wishful metaphysics, "for these subtleties must concretely be", we choose to believe in understandable desperation. Charles Ponce writes, and rights us, reorients us much neededly toward immediacy of Existence, of Nature in Her appeal, in Her drive for attestation:

"...we rebel essentially against the autonomy of Nature, the natural breakdown of Nature, the need of Nature to relax into itself, even to collapse into itself in the way that trees retreat into themselves with the advent of Winter...We turn away from our bodies in illness and death not because we have resolved the issue of the wound, but because it is far easier to think of an afterlife, far less fearful and painful to surround ourselves with the good feeling that we may not only escape this life in one psychic piece, but that we will no longer have to concern ourselves with our physical humanity...This approach to death robs us of our tie to Nature, strips us of our humanity in favor of an exquisite angelology of the ego. It allows us to slip past the experience of the mystery: that the body is indeed a great temple which moves slowly towards a breakdown and dissolution. The alchemists knew this: that the soul cannot fly, cannot be released from the vessel until the body is broken down, dissolved, and even putrified. When you read the alchemists you will discover that this breakdown and dissolution is the beginning of the Great Work, and that without experiencing and seeing, watching and attending to this momentous operation--keeping the fire of heart and attention at the proper degree--nothing happens. The soul does not fly, the subtle body is not created, nor is the imagination which is the soul's experience of itself open to eternity. It is this focus on the body and the wound in both life and death that leads to the sacred marriage of the alchemists. Paracelsus stressed, "The eternal is a sign of the dissolution of Nature, and not the beginning of created things, and the end in all things which no nature is without."

...A true medicine and counseling should therefore be one that addresses the immediate, the body of things and the body, for if we really wish to enter into the eternal, see the universe in a grain of sand, we must in our imagination understand...the soul's expression of itself through body, and that woundedness, disease, and the putrefactio of our humanity are for us in the West ordained as the focus of a yoga that sees in these sufferings the gods we have rejected." -- Charles Ponce, from "Paracelsus and the Wound", Working the Soul, Reflections on Jungian Psychology, pgs. 25-26.


Sensitive souls have reacted with shock to the elemental drama of life on this planet...this bone-crushing, bone-drinking drama in all its elementality and necessity. Life cannot go on without the mutual devouring of organisms. If at the end of each person's life he were to be presented with the living spectacle of all that he had organismically incorporated in order to stay alive, he might well feel horrified by the living energy he had ingested. The horizon of a gourmet, or even the average person, would be taken up with hundreds of chickens, flocks of lambs and sheep, a small herd of steers, sties full of pigs, and rivers of fish. The din alone would be deafening. To paraphrase Elias Canetti, each organism raises its head over a field of corpses, smiles into the sun, and declares life good. -- Ernest Becker, Escape From Evil, pg.2


"...So I said, "I am going to be a boxer...so I began training hard and hard and suddenly I have a pain in my chest so I say, "It's nothing, a torn muscle," and so I began again and again, training, training, training, and I went to a doctor and say, "Yeah, you have a torn muscle." Wrong. I have an infection in my heart so I went to a cardiologist and he said, "I have good news and bad news...the good news is that you are not a hypochondriac. The bad news is that your heart is completely swollen and that you can have a heart attack maybe today, maybe tomorrow, I don't know. So you have to go to bed NOW." And so I say, "Fuck!" And so I watch my hands. I say,

"My hands may be the hands of a corpse tomorrow.
They will not move anymore tomorrow." So I make
a commitment to caress the skins I have to caress,
to beat with my hands those I have to beat, and to
build something that will survive my hands," and that's
when I began to write furiously without stopping and
I have my studio full of skulls, not real ones but of
wood, stone...and every time I get tired I say, "Arriaga,
you are gonna die. You have to do something with your hands."

So until now I have caressed the skins that I have to caress,
I haven't beaten people that I like but I don't want to be
violent anymore, and I have been writing since then. Thus,
a personal fight against death...so I have two thoughts about
pain--the first, the worst thing you can do with pain is not using it.
You cannot waste pain. Another one is that pain is inevitable
but suffering is a decision so I use pain for writing and every time
I have pain I try to keep it and use it in a certain way...

I personally believe that Death doesn't present once, it presents daily and I always think that Death has a giant tongue that licks you. For example, this [rubs his thinning hair] is death licking my hair and says, "You thought you were okay? Well, there goes your new look." And, uh, cellulite in women and tits going down, it's like Death licking and, you know, we men (makes a gesture of an erect penis deflating), is like wop! wop! wop!...and when you lose someone you love, a woman, you are carrying the corpse of someone you love inside you...

They say that dust is skin flakes and I believe that every time
we wipe the dust we wipe the corpse of who we were at that time..."

-- Guillermo Arriaga, acclaimed Mexican writer, in conversation with Paul Auster at 2007 PEN Writer's Conference, has written screenplays, Babel, Amores Perros, The Three Burials of Melchiades Estrada, 21 Grams, and more. Here is the weblink to hear the entire conversation:

http://www.pen.org/audio_archive/2007_world_voices/auster_arriaga.mp3]


"The right thing happens to the happy man." Irony, indeed. Lately reading of suicidal poets, some favorites of my youth, and of Dostoevski's seizures, his ongoing grief at an infant daughter's death, his gambling addiction, ongoing constancies of light and dark, his continuing to write gripped by an unrelenting personal yet Russian, and ultimately universal, creative daemon.

Transcendence long sought and hard fought for in the act of art, in the depth cry toward surcease and significant if but momentary peace, I no longer wonder that some are wont to take holy vows and, tipping Cosmic Cows, cloak themselves in Blessed Silence, a breath out-sleeved. There may be more to me and thee between How-and-Now Cows, Father, than the undertaker's shovel and the deep blue sky and sea.

...I am a soul man, partial to soul, to space, to time, to locale, at more than a lover's quarrel with the world and very much so at quarrel with spirit. -- from Small Favors of Mourning, the author's journal

Alexis Zorba: Why do the young die? Why does anybody die?
Basil: I don't know.
Alexis Zorba: What's the use of all your damn books if they can't answer that?
Basil: They tell me about the agony of men who can't answer questions like yours.
Alexis Zorba: I spit on this agony!
-- from the film, Zorba the Greek, based upon the novel by Nikos Kazantzakis of the same title


For my beloved, Marianne Damhuis, thresholded,
now threshed by the Reaper requiring her Presence
elsewhere all the more Mysterious for having leapt
past the Skirt's Hem on December 13, 2008.

I can't help but think of her whose stars
she is now tempting in the blazing darkness
wheeling Sufi cartwheels o're our sad heads
not seeing hard enough through the veils,
layered skirts all, to her hair flaming red,
eyes flashing, parted lips perpetually exhaling,

bidding Dance! Dance! Dance! for the Beloved is here!
Dare to dance and be god filled, en-thused, laughing
at that rich ruse of Life -- barefeet dreaming of shoes.

Homesick for the dirt she sings,

No arms! No arms!

I've been to Hell and shout it
In a thousand-voiced chorus,

A thousand voices to harm!
I've been to Hell and back again!

I flaunt it like a gypsy's skirt
s!


And for the "Father Will" in us all, "time harried prisoners of Shall and Will"...


******************************************


[Please note: Father Will is a composite character, a convenient and necessary fiction drawn from my practice comprised of many, composed by one. Any resemblance to any actual person is completely accidental.]


A
client I will call Father Will brings to session a dream that he is dying. On a spiritual retreat in Big Sur, California at a Carmelite monastery and retreat center, the height and depth of geography match his physical and spiritual plight. There it is required that he must walk in spite of illness to the retreat master's house for physical effort must be made to approach what he might need to know in embodied existence before he dies. He closes the screen-door silently behind him, no slams allowed. A large window reveals a vista of sky and ocean, both immense. Tops of evergreens spike into view from the bottom window frame, trees upon the precipitous slope just below and beyond the house. Will reclines upon a combination divan and Freudian couch. The retreat master, his back to the window and the day light, silhouettes, his face unseen. His hands protrude from bone white cassock sleeves, appear to float holding a rosary--his muted voice praying the beads. Suddenly, in the voice of one who is dying Will urgently pleads, "Speak to me of the Resurrection". He weeps, waking up with tears of release and relief at the possibility of new life.

Father Will came to me referred by a client also in the clergy. I recall his chuckle when he came through my office door, looked around the room, not much light but from an airshaft window and another smaller one admitting reflected light from gray bricks in cool shadows between buildings; my endless book stacks on the floor spilling from the topsy turvy bookshelves, my collection from inner and outer travels, floor to fireplace mantle and walls holding statues, images, stones, art, bones, feathers, a black doll's head totem I made during a dark night of the soul, stuffed animals rescued from Salvation Armies and thrift stores the country round, art books opened to images of Inuit bone carvings, another to Grunewald's skin diseased Christ, and more all busily before the therapeutic couch, me in my one armed antique rocker a bit to the foreground of it all.

"Well," says Will good-naturedly, admiringly, referring to the decor, "it is certainly not Colonial American or even Bauhaus."

"Yes," I counter, "more like "post-Hiroshima," to which we both heartily laugh.

Planting himself in the middle of my archetypal sofa, that being the Great Mother in her devouring aspect, he quickly assesses what all the extra pillows are for arranging them behind him so he will not disappear into the couch stuffing.

Once settled he surmises, "I see that you, too, are a sufferer."

"I insist upon it," I respond, still resonant with the opening humor, knowing that I mean every word of what I have just said.

"Precisely. I know what you mean, I think. I don't know you but it has nothing to do with what William James calls "healthy-minded religion" verses "the sick souled" religion" (more on this just below).

"Yes. Happy-happy, good. Saddy-sacky bad," I parody.

We remain silent for awhile, Will's eyes close which give me time to look at him and feel what might be there as yet revealed, if ever. Then from some inner distance he speaks in a measured musical pace:


Let others probe the mystery if they can.
Time-harried prisoners of Shall and Will--
The right thing happens to the happy man.

The bird flies out, the bird flies back again;
The hill becomes the valley, and is still;
Let others delve that mystery if they can.

God bless the roots!--Body and soul are one!
The small become the great, the great the small;
The right thing happens to the happy man.

Child of the dark, he can out leap the sun,
His being single, and that being all:
The right thing happens to the happy man.

Or he sits still, a solid figure when
The self-destructive shake the common wall;
Takes to himself what mystery he can,

And, praising change as the slow night comes on,
Wills what he would, surrendering his will
Till mystery is no more: No more he can.
The right thing happens to the happy man.

Opening his eyes, he looks quizzically at me.

"Theodore Roethke," I say, "Part of the new scripture, at least for me. "The Right Thing" and just the right spin on happiness for that spin is really the Whirlwind, or God as Trauma, or Fate, rendering the personal will, that tyrant, into surrendering. We have options, we rebel, we relent, and choosing either we make acts which may serve, others, the self, and always, inform the blind, amoral Whirlwind of the creaturely experience. Art underscores and secures the point."

William James, the great Harvard psychologist and American pragmatist philosopher, brother to novelist Henry James, teacher of Gertrude Stein, a young psychology student before she became, well, Gertrude Stein, gave still important lectures while at the University of Edinborough, in Scotland between 1902 and 1903. His widely read now classic book about the psychology of religion, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) is taken from his edited Gilford lectures. In them James addresses and "defends a popular movement in the country called the mind-cure movement which emphasized the healing power of positive emotions and beliefs using the movement's therapeutic claims to illustrate the typically American, practical turn of the "religion of healthy-mindedness". Varieties sympathetically surveys mind-cure literature, but also criticizes healthy-minded religion for its limited range and refusal to confront tragedy and radical evil " (italics are mine to emphasize this point so pertinent to any discussion of "pathological happiness". The information in this paragraph is gleaned from this online website with an article titled, "William James, Mind-cure, and the Religion of Healthy-mindedness" by Donald F. Duclow, http://www.springerlink.com/content/pmthy0m5xx8b10rt/).

To further expound upon James' description of these two types of spiritual health, Wikipedia's online site is brief and helpful here:

"James described two types of spiritual health:
  • The healthy mind, described in Lectures IV and V under the title of "The religion of healthy-mindedness". The healthy-minded have a naturally positive outlook on life. Perhaps influenced by the popularity of the Mind-Cure Movement, a social pressure group of the day that promoted positive thinking as a cure for disease and depression, James assumed that some people simply are happy. "We find such persons in every age, passionately flinging themselves upon their sense of the goodness of life, in spite of the hardships of their own condition, and in spite of the sinister theologies in which they may be born. From the outset, their religion is one of union with the divine" says James. In the lectures, Walt Whitman is a favorite example of healthy mindedness. James quotes Francis William Newman, describing such individuals as seeing God, "not as a strict Judge, not as a Glorious Potentate, but as the animating Spirit of a beautiful harmonious world. Beneficent and Kind, Merciful as well as Pure".
  • The sick soul, described in Lectures VI and VII. Those people having a sick soul are those who are depressed and see the evil in all things. James focused on this "divided soul" personality as the candidate for the benefits of conversion. He believed that the only way for a sick soul to cure itself is to undergo a powerful mystical experience, or religious conversion. He argues these so-called "twice born" souls turn out to be the most healthy in the end, since they have seen life from both perspectives."
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Varieties_of_Religious_Experience]

“For now we see through a glass, darkly…” (1 Cor. 13:12) -- The Bible

Years ago in order to graduate as an ordained interfaith minister, the seminary required that each student write a cosmology thesis which presented and articulated his or her view of the world. Almost at the outset of the project I became aware that I had two cosmologies going at once. One was my preferred belief system, a system of nice thoughts, spiritual ideas, behaviors and hopes, valid enough for persona and ego concerns, certainly most reasonable and "why can't we all just get along?" The second cosmology, what I call "the Devil's cosmology", was and still is the set of beliefs, presuppositions, assumptions, complexes, insistant unavoidable shadow both positive and negative, comprising a large personal slice of the pie of the Collective Unconscious which I actually lived and was/am most often in the grip of which lived/lives me. My preferred belief system did not really impact this greater default of the Psyche, that irrevocable fact that I was not the only person living in my inner house and that Other did not live or operate by my preferred beliefs, behaviors, rules and rectitudes. Rectal-tudes was more the reality. What was a parson soon to be to do or be when confronted with cosmological duality?

Stoically, I abandoned the first preferred "Good and Happy", "Right and Bright Thinking" cosmology which was actually an inflated ego imposition upon the bedeviling realities, dare I say, personalities within me. Having studied William James in college for my philosophy degree and utilizing his notion of the two religions I pondered that sick souled religion might be my actual religion much as I did not like the pathology implied in its name. Being young and hopeful I postponed the issue (even though more evidence gathered daily) and it was only years later in Jungian analysis and very late in my seminary studies and the clear awareness of my inner split did I actively, reluctantly, humbly, angrily, ambivalently embrace the darkness within which would not, could not, be turned into Light by denial and right thinking in any spiritual "charm school" or class I had attended which often enough did me more harm than good in that they fostered and deepened an already wide split between spirit and matter in me which, no surprise but seems to surprise many, is the human condition. My thesis then-- no real choice now that the split, the division, the duality was even more clear -- would be about darkness, the "Devil's cosmology" and thus I began to compose and read, culling from a variety of sources. Once I began to embrace the darkness, my darkness, the darkness in existence and the sick souled cosmology within, upon, and from which I was oft motivated, I synchronistically discovered two texts which greatly supported me in my explication of the dark.

The first text I happened upon in the "religious seconds" (curious moniker, that, and a fitting description of my spiritual life then and now) book section in the sub-basement (that is fitting, too) at The Strand Bookstore. Its title alone immediately gripped me, Epiphanies of Darkness, Deconstruction In Theology, by Charles E. Winquist. At the beginning of the chapter from which the book title is derived Winquist quotes John Dominic Crossan, "...we do not mourn that we see through a glass darkly, we now rejoice in the dark loveliness of the glass."

"Now that is an intriguing reframe!" I thought.

Instantly seduced, I read on, "To rejoice in the dark loveliness of the glass" is an alteration of values that suggest we can know the darkness, think in the dark, or think darkly...learning to see in the dark is learning to see the light darkly...The task at hand is to replicate the familiar world of daily life in the shadow world of the imagination. The world we already know can then be known in the dark. We thereby teach ourselves to think in the dark so that we can live in the middle. This strange exercise is a taking hold of life. It is a valuation of where and who we are."

Hillman's Peaks and Vales Discovered,
More James And The Vale of Soul-Making


Around the time of my discovery of Winquist's book I had a conversation with a Jungian analyst, a friend with whom I often spoke during my almost completed four years of training in the seminary. I needed an outsider "well acquainted with the dark" to work through some of the more New Age and New Thought (Mind Cure spiritual program) aspects of the program. She mentioned that I might find James Hillman's second chapter helpful in his book of essays on the puer aeternus (the archetype of the eternal youth/boy), The Puer Papers. Once again, the chapter title alone provided two archetypal images which undergird James' two religions, healthy minded and sick souled -- "Peaks and Vales". Mountaintops and valleys. The image of mountain peaks accurately depicts healthy-mindedness just as the vale, or valley, depicts sick souledness. But before I ascend and descend to amplify these images let me first offer a summary and some surmises on James and his two religions.

James' applies his pragmatist philosophy to the study of religion which, as has already been reported, he reduces to healthy mindedness or sick souledness. An implication of pragmatism in terms of religious beliefs is that they can be chosen for convenience because pragmatism places highest value upon convenience and the absolute power of the ego, the "God of Convenience", to choose with it's emphasis upon utilitarian, quickest-means-to-an-end choices creating belief systems of expediency baptized by magical thinking, wish fulfillment, social presumption and dubious promises of personal power. Pragmatism reduces religion/cosmology to rational ego choices thus inflating the ego, making it god-like, all the while losing sight of, and conscious connection to, the archetypal FACT that there is Something or Some Dimension Greater, pluralities of them, than the ego dwelling within us and around us, the Self, Jung's term for that Greater Center from, through, by, with and for which the ego exists. Still, the ego believes it is THE only center while the unconscious with all its contents or "discontents" is a by-product of egoic repressions. This is essentially Freud's view and post-Freudian psychologies have not veered too far from this reduction of the unconscious to a "nothing but", or butt, of repressed consciousness.

James being a psychologist and philosopher was not only interested in the actual religious beliefs and what they did for the believer, he was also interested in how much emotions inform and determine choosing those beliefs, i.e. "I choose this belief because it makes me feel good. " Emotions also play most powerful roles in how religious practices and rituals are designed for emotional impact which also affects choices of beliefs and belief systems "which make me feel good." Healthy minded and sick souled religion reveal temperaments of believers and are most assuredly derived from, and unique to, individual personalities and predispositions. The word temperament in part means a "characteristic state of mind".

Carl Jung read Williams James intently while working on his book, Psychological Types, from which the later Myers-Briggs personality test along with others derived. Jung reports that he felt compelled to write this book in order to understand his own conflict with Freud, along with Adler's and others' conflicts with Freud and himself. Jung arrived at his introversion and extroversion as the two basic attitudes toward existence along with his four types (what I prefer to call lenses) or expressions through which one differentiates and shapes one's personal encounter with the world-- thinking, feeling, intuition and sensation. He found that many of his major differences with Freud, Adler, others had much to do with the differing typologies of each which naturally provoked creative and ultimately divisive conflicts. It must be said that divisiveness is also creative and it is helpful to see it as such much as our personal war flags may be planted solidly on our side, the right side, of course, of the conflict. An excellent example of this important point is that as a result of these conflicts between Freud and Jung and a host of others the intellectual world has benefited greatly from their articulated differences deriving diverse and effective approaches to human suffering and its cures.

Without going further into Jungian typology suffice it say that James' impact and shaping of the dialogue and the language of that dialogue, especially in the psychology of religion, is still significant. The core of American philosophy is deeply pragmatic and James along with other pragmatists continues to shape and flavor this "typically American turn of mind". From Jung's typology I understand that James' two choices are available archetypal dimensions in every human no matter what their innate dispositions or temperaments toward healthy or sick souled religions may be. Both dimensions are complements and compensations for the other and, as Jung discovered, if one is identified more with one than the other then that other is "alive and well" in the unconscious. Integral work which Jung calls individuation with it's drive toward wholeness (what I refer to as conscious "holdness", a containing of opposites) is the continuous hard and meaningful work of making conscious and expressing that which is in the unconscious to compensate for one sided ego consciousness. Thus, if one is too identified with the positive "sunny, always merry and bright" temperament then one is guaranteed a fated encounter with the darker, heavier negative one for as Jung soberingly points out, "that which one does not make conscious he or she is destined to live as Fate". We are all fated to encounter both ranges of psychological/religious experience or we indeed are one-dimensional beings out of touch with the rich opportunities within and in between the two poles of healthy mindedness and sick souledness. The spectrum of nuance and tone deepens and informs as well as shapes and forms authentic character of individuals and cultures.

The nature of human consciousness is dialectical--an awareness of the opposites out of which may come the third thing, the new integral understanding and experience born of the tension between. This ongoing process of thought, this dialectic in human awareness, is the stuff of religion, philosophy, psychology, art, of all human experience. Unitive experiences are derived from the a priori dynamics of opposition, duality, polarity. Dialectically speaking, to nominate the peak as the most numinous, valuable and essential part of the mountain is to devalue and repress the valley into the unconscious which guarantees a fated encounter with the valley. This works both ways although there is something about the valley which figures more prominently and descriptively in the human experience than with the peak. Hillman distinguishes 'spirit' from 'soul' in his essay associating spirit with peaks and soul with valleys. A psychoanalyst and therefore oriented toward soul, psyche means soul, he amplifies the vale archetype defining its vital function by quoting and amplifying the British Romantic poet John Keats' statement, "Call the world if you please the vale of soul-making. Then you will find out the use of the world." I am immediately struck by the word 'use' in the statement since pragmatism seeks those utilitarian uses of things, thoughts/ beliefs, activities and expressions. One can venture that there is a pragmatism of peaks and a pragmatism of vales. Perhaps they overlap or depending upon where one is at are put to different uses to possibly serve a greater whole, although wholeness language is "peaks" or spirit language. Vale language is a polyglot of experiences which re- and de- generate as does Great Nature create and destroy in endless variety preferring the messiness to the dress of order. Wallace Stevens in the seventh and final part of his poem, Sunday Morning, lows:

We live in an old chaos of the sun,
Or old dependency of day and night,
Or island solitude, unsponsored, free,
Of that wide water, inescapable.
Deer walk upon our mountains, and the quail
Whistle about us their spontaneous cries;
Sweet berries ripen in the wilderness;
And, in the isolation of the sky,
At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings.



So. Downward let us go, to darkness, the realm of soul which is a human and inhuman place. Multiplicities. Polytheistic. There are gods of the valleys and even near or upon the copse but the peak points to something other than multiplicity, something unitive and one. The peak is one spirited. Monotheistic. Thus is the history of human consciousness, the question of the one and the many, of unity and diversity, the four essences, earth, air, fire, water and that one essence which holds them all, that fifth essence, the quintessence. This dialectic of running and returning, ascending and descending, is the way of human consciousness.

Soul, says Hillman, is "concrete, multiple, and immanent," it is history, personal and collective, whereas spirit is "one, abstract, unified, concentrated," it's relationship to time is as the eliminator of history. Hillman expands:

"The peaks wipe out history. History is to be overcome. History is bunk...So the spirit workers and spirit seekers first of all must climb over the debris of history, or prophesy its end or its unreality, time as illusion, as well as the history of their individual and particular localities, their particular ethnic and religious roots...the spirit is impersonal, rooted not in local soul, but timeless." By an over emphasis on spirit, says Hillman, "history has become the Great Repressed." Thus our need to compensate too much spirit by psychological soul work which involves going into history, into the valleys where shadows are cast (ancient sun devices tracked shadows thus history is shadow), personal and transpersonal, in order to work "our complexes" [which are] history at work in the soul [italics are mine, WF]...it is so much easier to transcend history by climbing the mountain and let come what may [note the temptation of pragmatism to do the easy thing which is not necessarily the ultimately efficacious thing. See Joan Poelvoorde's essay on spiritual bypassing] than it is to work on history within us, our reactions, habits, moralities, opinions, symptoms that prevent true psychic change. Change in the valley requires recognition of history, an archeology of the soul, a digging in the ruins, a re-collecting. And--a planning in specific geographical and historical soil with its own smell and savor, in connection with spirits of the dead, the po-soul sunk in the ground below [po-soul in ancient Chinese cosmology was the earth soul, characterized by yin]...from the viewpoint of soul and life in the vale, going up the mountain feels like a desertion. The lamas and saints "bid farewell to their comrades" [a quote from a letter by the current Dalai Lama of Tibet. You can read it in appendix 1 below]." Hillman continues, "As I'm here an advocate of soul, I have to present its viewpoint. Its viewpoint appears in the long hollow depression of the valley."

Of History And Soul, Of Fleetingness And
A Thing's Gracious Gift To The Eternal

I am a soul man, partial to soul, to space, to time, to locale, at more than a lover's quarrel with the world and very much so at quarrel with spirit which "deigns to destroy us," says the poet Rilke, "us the most fleeting of all". Rilke is a soul man who spent much time on the peaks and even more time in the valleys. In the Nineth Duino Elegy Rilke is actually covering soul's ground, expanding Keats foundational statement about vales and the use of the world, meaning a fuller spectrum experience of life and the Eternal's being enriched from the shadows, the surfaces, the subterranean. The Eternal is not complete after all. The Eternal needs the temporal, what is gained there in consciousness, the Eternal needs a where, an orientation, particularity, to be more substantial (substance is in this word) whole, wholeness here meaning an ongoing process of completion and depletion, filled in with something in cycles of chaos and return rather than abstraction. He begins:

"Why, when this span of life might be fleeted away
as laurel, a little darker than all
the surrounding green, with tiny waves on the border
of every leaf (like the smile of a wind): - oh, why
have to be human, and shunning Destiny,
long for Destiny?...
Not because happiness really
exists, that precipitate profit of imminent loss.
Not out of curiosity, not just to practice the heart,
that could still be there in laurel...
But because being here is much, and because all this
that's here, so fleeting, seems to require us and strangely
concerns us. Us the most fleeting of all. Just once,
everything, only for once. Once and no more. And we, too,
once. And never again. But this
having been once on earth - can it ever be canceled?"

As Hillman says, the peak (spirit) wipes out history. Rilke's question, which become an assertion in his asking, (that "having been?" which is to be historical and eternal) asserts that history can never be canceled. It is continuing human creativity which evolves not only human kind via creatures and creation but also the Abstract, the Peak, Spirit.

Lest it be thought that I am voting for sickness over health, gravity over levity, Jamesian distinctions, I suggest that to be is to express and to attest to and for the Blind Universe, that Wholey Other Eternal Abstraction, of the implicate fullness of material being, of incarnation from quantum to quarry where physical being is an agony and an ecstasy and all between. It is this experience with its words, its knowledge, Rilke says, that we bring to the discarnate "angelic" spirit realms:

"Praise this world to the Angel, not the untellable: you
can't impress him with the splendour you've felt...So show him
some simple thing, refashioned by age after age,
till it lives in our hands and eyes as a part of ourselves.
Tell him things."

Refashioned by age after age -- in other words, by history. These things have soul, are soul, are ensouled by our conscious physical existence and our responsiveness in the vales. John Tarrant, a Buddhist, Jungian-oriented psychotherapist and poet says as much in these opening lines:

"There is a blessed fidelity in things.
Graceless things grow lovely with good uses."

And this is true of ourselves. Practical and pragmatic the soul is.

Religion Of Peaks,
Religion Of
Vales,
Of Giants And Small Things


While continuing the creative/destructive struggle over my ordination thesis, after having discovered "Peaks and Vales" by Hillman, I spoke of it with my brother, Larry, a Christian minister with an inner city ministry in West Philadelphia, a vale if ever there was one. We often share with each other what we are reading and thinking, our both having voracious appetites for both. Upon hearing me out in the latest throe and woe, Larry read to me from a tale, The Hammer of God by C.K. Chesterton, a well-known British theologian and writer in the early 1900's. In the tale Chesterton writes of peaks and vales as religious attitudes, too, and of a preference for vales, and of the use or misuse and the danger of religious peaks:


"I think there is something rather dangerous about standing on these high places even to pray," said Father Brown. "Heights were made to be looked at, not to be looked from."

"Do you mean that one may fall over," asked Wilfred.

"I mean that one's soul may fall if one's body doesn't," said the other priest.

"I scarcely understand you," remarked Bohun indistinctly.

"Look at that blacksmith, for instance," went on Father Brown calmly; "a good man, but not a Christian--hard, imperious, unforgiving. Well, his Scotch religion [Presbyterian Scotch Calvinism] was made up by men who prayed on hills and high crags, and learnt to look down on the world more than to look up at heaven. Humility is the mother of giants. One sees great things from the valley; only small things from the peak."

Practical Mysticism--Pragmatism Of Peaks, Pragmatism Of Vales, Of ML King, Jr. And Jacob's Wrestle With The Angel

A seminary professor whose name I cannot recall -- Johnson? -- who taught Martin Luther King, Jr, made an astute and magnificent statement which could be and is here, at least, a text for practical mysticism integrating both peaks and vales:

"The more I relate to everything everywhere
[peaks language, unity and one, spirit], the more
I must relate to something somewhere
[vale language, diversity, many, soul]."

King knew him some valleys. He also knew knew him some peaks. He surely "had been to the mountaintop" and had seen what lay ahead, "the promised land" below, in the valley. Right use of peaks, to speak pragmatically, is just this having the vision, seeing below and what lies ahead, all the while knowing that there is the "what remains to be seen" for "we see through a glass darkly" even from the peak" though the challenged glass may break. And then? One brails upon the descending trails to depths in order to arrive, strive, hopefully thrive toward the "milk and honey" land, the bread to be made there swelling beneath the enfolded shrouded vales. Speech will come. The dumbness ever dumb still sings for the soul compels it "and the world wags" dialectically on (William Shakespeare). There is an Italian proverb which lays the dialectic out with a tricksterish word at the end to guarantee continual flux of being in time and what can be known : "The world wags on with three things: doing, undoing, and pretending," from "before" + præ-tendere "to aim, stretch, extend" from PIE base *ten- "to stretch", a stretching before or a before stretch implying something ahead, imaginally leapt or gained, darkly fetched or filched.

In the wag of the world there are, indeed, authentic 'peak' experiences integrating conflicting opposites within and without which turns one toward a more expansive embrace of the givens of human existence, full spectrum living which Zorba the Greek calls the "full catastrophe": "Zorba replies: "Am I not a man? And is not a man stupid? I’m a man. So I married. Wife, children, house, everything. The full catastrophe." This is very much the "wag on world with the three things, doing, undoing, pretending", peak and vale, the full mountain lived from top to bottom.

The "typically American" insistence upon so-called happiness, an exaggeration and an idolatry of peaks, a mania of material acquisition of extroverted extreme experiences (from TV's Survivor series to extreme sports to speed dating to strangling oneself or another while masturbating or copulating and so on) results in the ongoing epidemic of addictions (peaks) and epidemic depression, a vale which is meant to bring us down to earth out of identity with peaks and onto and into the earth, a compensation for being too high, too inflated, too "god-almighty" and flighty. One need only reread of Icarus and his identification with the Sun, flying too close, to see him and our culture spun and spinning down to earth where paradoxically, many a "peak" experience is to be had in the valley haplessly encountering the hard ground or the daemon or chthonic spirit/eesh which renders an end to the old ego identity (Jacob of Judaic scriptures,for instance) bringing forth a more authentic and related -to-something-somewhere self (again, Once-Was-Jacob-Now-Israel, meaning in Hebrew, one who has prevailed with God, or as my kabbalah teacher, Shira Kober-Zeller translates, God wrestler).

Tourettic Expostulation/Expustulation:

O run from those sunny ones who
know not and wrestle not with the
"unnamed occluded god(s)" where
in the wound which is a blessing one
might awaken and make "a broken music"
rather than a bliss-ninny, one-note
hummana hum-aum-ana humming
in droning sameness for eternity.

Droll, I tell you, droll!!

In more detail here, the Biblical story of Jacob and the Angel wrestling in the desert place the whole night long is a soul story underscoring what is to be gained in the valley -- a blessing hard fought for where the progeny of Jacob continually historically wrestle over disputed birthrights to securely bordered land. Jacob, a liar, trickster, thief and mama's boy (she colluded in Jacob's stealing his older twin brother Esau's birthright by deceiving his blind father), has fled being pursued by Esau, by conscience, by shadow which burgeoned so forcefully that he spent many a day and night in the exiled, waste places. Knowing that his brother's armies were not but a day's journey or two from his being captured and justly punished Jacob encounter in the night a dark spirit, an eesh in Hebrew tongue (eesh is cognate to the name of who was pursuing Jacob, Eeshau, Esau, his swindled brother), with which he wrestled the long night through. Jacob was forced to fight back, to push against the dark force which had so often driven him to unconscionable, egotistical, power mad crimes. This wrestling in the vale, a peak experience if ever there was one, not a happy one but an equally integrating and disintegrating one bearing within it the ongoing internal and historical struggle with hems, boundaries and borders, was a finalizing confrontation with his power devil, his shadow, and with the shadowy deity manifesting in history. As the horizon was beginning to brighten with the coming light of dawn, Jacob, wounded in the thigh (a euphemism for genitals) held tightly to the eesh who, tables reversed, struggled to get free for being a creature of the darkness (the unconscious) it could not endure the daylight. "I will not let you go until you bless me," Jacob demanded. And thus he was blessed by the night-veiled one of the dark vale, the shadow -- his name would now be Israel, God-wrestler.

This story illustrates a pragmatism of vales where one has the disorienting to be reoriented encounter with That which has become fated to be lived and wrestled with until a blessing comes forth. Here is an important soul truth, oh healthy and sick minded ones, that it is pragmatic to wrestle with and demand a blessing from the Dark, the Concealed, the Hidden Contrary in need of a good gripe and grapple hard-scrabble in the gravel and grave of the vale which in the Biblical story Jacob named Penial, meaning, face of god encountered in darkness, veiled, unnamed (for when Jacob asked the eesh its name it refused to give one. I imagine it responding this way, "Don't ask. If I told you I would have to kill you.") No blessing is guaranteed and the blessing which comes may not at all appear as one thinks and affirms a blessing ought to appear. Jacob/Israel may have limped for the rest of his life for enduring and prevailing in the night-long battle but limped he was not, meaning flaccid, drooping, slack, loose, to hang down; also, limbus "hem, border". Interestingly, synchronistically, only in this sense of limbus-limp was Jacob/Israel now historically hemmed in, a border, a literal nation battling still over borders feeling hemmed in by shadows wanting the sacred ground, too, a hemmed in place where history and archetype still uncomfortably meet.

The alchemy of vales can make the very wound the very blessing but one must endure the vale and also know a peak or two in order to endure the dark night where one's peak vision is tested, destroyed, depotentiated or made all the more potent with the lingering stench of eesh and flesh at odds. In the vale, in the waste place, the potential for the decisive and fated transformative encounter may occur and it may be death. In vale religion death admits one even more deeply into history, into ancestral being, with Days of the Dead and other thin-veiled dead soul visitations and interactions with the living in time.

Everything everywhere.
Something somewhere.
And between the two
the liminal nowhere where
there is no there there yet
one is riveted to the spot.

What emerges there
between peak and vale
was but now is not
but is historical, mythos,
narrative and scar, character,
which speaks to existence,
to having been, to presence as
witness and response no matter
the every where, some where,
nowhere one may find oneself
or selves at, in, with and for.

There is an ecstasy of suffering
equal to that of happiness. One
need only look at images of so-called
saints the world over, their eyes
rolled back into their heads,
excruciating visages hard to read --
joy or pain?

Twice born means twice dead.

How strange is life where a Biblical swindler becomes a nation blessed with generativity beyond measure and born again for all the eesh wrestling to new error and thus to new consciousness. As Carl Jung says, "We must make mistakes. We must live out our own vision of life. And there will be error. If you avoid error you do not live...Carry through your life as well as you can even if it is based on error, because life has to be undone, and one often gets to truth through error...So be human, seek understanding, seek insight, and make your hypothesis, your philosophy of life. Then we may recognize the Spirit alive in the unconscious of every individual," (C.G. Jung Speaking, Princeton University Press, pg. 98).

And thus history wags, unfolds, peak and vale,tooth and nail, spirit and soul seeing and singing "through the glass, a kind of veil, darkly" with swearing and praise to the end while never ceasing to marvel at "the dark loveliness of the glass." The tales tell us so. We contribute our own leaving many sentences dangling in the vales where dangle is allowed or, dangling on the edge of a peak because we have been too long too high, our soul demands that we come down by any means necessary to the "necessary angel of the earth" (Wallace Stevens), the valley, the cleft where that angel, the angel of the Imagination, does its work in the human soul, doing, undoing, pretending.


*****************************************


PART TWO:

[Should you wish to go directly to further account of Father Will, his biography and more dreams during the counseling work scroll down to Father Will Dreams And The Dream of His-Story.]


Some Gratuitious Personal Thoughts



I have said already and it bears repeating that I believe that James' division of the two types of spiritual health, albeit pragmatic and convenient for rational discussion, does not actually acknowledge the fact that both experiences are within and are optionally available as responses for every individual. Carl Jung, who studied and greatly valued James, helpfully discovered the binary nature of human consciousness, simply put, that whatever is in the conscious mind has its opposite equally and powerfully in the unconscious which manifest as shadow, symptom and synchronicity for "what one does not live consciously," says Jung, "one is destined to live as Fate". If one is as James says temperamentally healthy-minded then the "sick-soul" attitude is in the unconscious and shows up as shadow and symptom in the self-identified (meaning ego-identified) healthy-minded one. Positive "mind-cure" approaches automatically engender tremendous resistance against locating and integrating the so-called "sick souled" aspect of oneself. Sick souledness is shadow in the healthy-minded one and is destined to be lived as fate, both consciously and unconsciously.

Having personally studied and spent years amongst both religious attitudes which are temperaments I can attest that the denial of the negative side of human experience and of evil is just as unhealthy as the overbearing negative sick souled emphasis I encountered in Protestant Christianity of the Calvinist ilk. More bred in the latter the time spent in the former was well-spent but at some point became out of balance until I realized that both approaches are expressions of the soul which is inclusive of both. I recall here a client overly identified with the healthy-minded viewpoint in compensation for too much suffering in childhood and adolescence. He began to dream repeatedly of high buildings and expansive climbing bridges terrifyingly collapsing. He dreamed of being on the edge of ledges and cliffs at great heights with powerful forces he could not resist pulling him into the abyss. In other dreams planes fell out of skies, mountains crumbled into seas or into the earth. Having read widely of New Age material regarding thoughts "creating your own reality" and a student of psychic channeling he interpreted the dreams as precognitive and psychic rather than beginning with his need to come down to earth and deal with the painful side of his personal history and the tragic side of existence. It was only when his hair began to fall out in clumps that he began to confront his past, discover compassion and the healthiness of wholing powerful human emotions which the New Age books and channels had discouraged and judged as unhealthy contributors to his and the culture's sickness. I must confess that this is one of the most prevalent and most difficult of belief systems to work with. To take a cue from a client's dreams like these and begin to gently approach the message of imbalance in too much "positive, high-up thinking" puts one in an awkward position as an advocate for the darker side, the down side of things, existence, behaviors, energies. Although I do not seek to change a person's personal belief system, nor should I, I have found that the Psyche does which is why I pay attention to dreams.

In my own healing work and psychoanalysis my symptoms, complexes and dreams (night ones, and the dream of waking life) engender ongoingly, without caring for my ego and it conscious beliefs, a confrontation with the unconscious deconstructing and destroying like my client's skyscrapers falling down along with the waking dream of his hair, my one-sided ego identifications/reifications evident in behaviors derived from what Jung calls the ego complex, the conscious and unconscious beliefs, deductions, conclusions and contusions about my personal existence and the cosmos in general. The psyche addresses, guides, corrects and, yes, demands a change of mind with one's persona and behavior altering (often with resistance, fear and trembling or with relief, joy and relish!) to accommodate the greater wholeness being insisted upon by what Jung calls the "Self", that totality that we are of which the ego is only a part and can know only in part thus the importance of a conscious relationship to one's dreams and the Imagination. This cuts both ways as the psyche also can assert, yea, insist the overt positivity upon tho ego-identified way too dour sour puss, what Jung calls negative inflation. The psyche does not want saintliness but, rather, wholeness which does not mean perfection but maturing, ripening, evolving and developing in time as one integrates both positive and negative aspects of self, the opposites, which insist upon living what Zorba the Greek calls the "full catastrophe" of fuller humanity, halos and hellholes as equally valid options of expression and creation depending upon psychic balances, circumstance and awareness.

Perhaps my biggest "beef" with both healthy-minded and sick-souled religious approaches is that they both deny their opposite while elevating one over the other thus forcing the split in human consciousness further into the shadows and therefore guaranteeing painful yet ultimately meaningful and essentially creative confrontations with the unconscious. Peter Brooks, the gifted British director of plays and films, in a documentary interview about the life of Jungian analyst, the late Helen Luke, spoke of his "being a realist -- if one is an optimist one is too imbalanced. If one is a pessimist, likewise. Being a realist gives one helpful and multi-dimensional recourse to full spectrum living with access to both realities of optimism and pessimism thus enriching life, its experience, its meaning and its art.

This "mind-cure" belief system is still very much the stuff of American popular culture and religion and one only need peruse bookstores on and offline to find how pervasive these paradoxically dangerous and toxic-because-one sided pragmatic "positive thinking" beliefs are which mostly deny and certainly, if acknowledged at all, judge and devalue the dark, tragic and evil aspects of human existence.

Much of New Thought, Science of Mind and other "new" religious movements of the New Age and psychically channeled material derives and repeats "mind-cure" beliefs. Interestingly, it is no accident that Jane Roberts, probably the most famous and widely read "best seller" channeler in the hippie and post-hippie New Age movement wrote a channeled book called "The Afterlife Journal of William James." Roberts claims to have never read James but he, American pragmatism, New Thought and other push-positive and spiritualistic belief systems are such a part of the American psyche and culture, brilliantly intuitive though Roberts perhaps was, it is not a stretch to think that many could have intuitively channeled/written something of this American "mind-cure" without knowing of any of these men or movements. It is not necessary today especially since one needs only to tune in popular culture, radio and TV talk shows, and films espousing The Secret and Bleeps, Fields of Dreams and reams of channeled material purveying anti-intellectual, non-critical thinking pablum appealing to reptilian brain, child mind and the quest for material stuff which we are told will make one happy.

Louis Menand's excellent book, The Metaphysical Club, explores in detail the historical personages and personalities of American pragmatism. If one is at all conversant with New Age, New Thought, Science of Mind, Jane Roberts, the Hicks and other psychically channeled material Menand's book provides foundation to what has come to be a religious phenomenon of push-positive thinking that could never have happened anywhere but in the extroverted sensation temperament of the United States.

Father Will Dreams And The Dream of His-Story

Will's dream of dying, his sudden intuitive insistence upon hearing "of the Resurrection" set within the immensities and extremes of remoteness, of heights, of depths, and of majestic yet cold and cruel Nature out the retreat master's window, of the givens of sickness, decay and death, depict his inner tumult as does the violent sea wrack wrenching rendering stone and soil from the yielding shore into the relentless sucking sea. A former religious (one who takes vows and joins a religious order) who lived the severities and austerities required, according to Will's early enthusiatic beliefs, , in order to cultivate holiness requisite for relationship to Go post-ordination into priesthood he eventually left the order after a series of recurring dreams of Vocation where he was continually tending to an abject dieing man in a third world country in extreme poverty. With permission from his abbot he left the order and joined one who served the poor and dieing of India, then East Pakistan. He was there, a young man, during The Bangladesh Liberation War, an armed conflict pitting West Pakistan against East Pakistan (two halves of one country) and India, which resulted in the secession of East Pakistan to become the independent nation of Bangladesh. Many men, women and children were displaced, starved, killed in the warfare or died of diseases.

It was in Bangladesh Will became one "well acquainted with grief" ( Isaiah 53:3). His exposure to sustained human suffering took its toll psychologically, calling into question the supposed goodness of an All Good God. His faith in tremendous crisis, he took his daily and sustaining grace from encounters with the living and the dieing, their attempts at affirming life in the midst of ongoing human catastrophe. He reverently told me of children playing witha mostly deflated soccer ball in the midst of human carnage wit and immediacy of ecstatic presense as only children can have in their resilient innocence. Will feelingly spoke of the passion of Christ, the suffering, the crucifixion, the burial and of the account that while He was dead He descended into hell to minister to the lost souls there. We both mused that if such was indeed the case, that the Great Physician spent time in hell then hell would never be the same after that. We were amused together about "when was the last time you heard a good sermon preached on this most obvious and revolutionary story of Compassion's descent into hell therefore hell would never be the same again from such a Visitation and assumed liberation. Will willed himself to live in the antinomy of the meaningless suffering he witnessed and ministered to and the mystery of the Paschal Christ suffering, dieing, descending into hell and being present with those there. His dream urgency to hear of the Resurrection speaks to his lack of belief in it as a living experience but for the incidents of human kindness in the midst of injustice, cruelty, and suffering.

After some years in Bangladesh Will served the poor in various orders in Africa and eventually, semi-retired, returned to New York City where he taught in several seminaries. The extreme contrast between America, its extraverted materialistic values, New York City being a glaring example, and emphasis upon the self, upon money and all it can buy, became toxic for him. The almost comical and maudlin mostly media-driven "god talk and spirit talk" he heard daily from politicians to TV preachers to talk show hosts, the consumerization of not only Christianity but of other world religions parsed and piece-milled together by choice (remember, America is pragmatic, one picks and chooses a belief by ego and will) in a hodge podge porridge of sentiment and show ("namaste") appalled him. He could not identify with the almost protoplasmic drive of American "greed and gimme gimme", and the apparent, he felt, unholy wedding of many religious institutions, including the one he spent his life within, and spiritual belief systems. From the conservative Christian prosperity gospel to New Age "think and be rich" spirituality which are actually one and the same in terms of means to monetary ends he found himself more and more alienated. He also reacted to the mania, what James Hillman has pointed out as a manic defense, passed off as "happiness" in one of the most, if not the most, depressed country in the world ironically devoted to, in part, "the pursuit of happiness".

He, too, became depressed, a man without a country in his native land, his isolation exacerbated by his life experience of living amongst the most profoundly poor and suffering of the world and witnessing the most authentic joy and happpiness amidst the worst of circumstances of genuine human suffering. Potentially serious health concerns from years of diseases, the physical and emotional hard work in third world nations now prevent his longed for return to live and die amongst whom he believes to be "the poorest yet most joyous". Observing the tragic and buffoonish irony in the manic pursuit of American recreational shopping and acquisition, its addictive and psychopathic disregard for others, even wealthy others much less the less well off and more unfortunate, "culture shock," he said, "does not even come close to what I am feeling here and for all of my inner and outter resourcefulness in the midst of my work with "the used, abused and utterly screwed up" (a phrase he culled from Thomas Klise's profound novel of the decline of the world, The Last Western) I am at wits end to find a way toward meaningful living in a culture which complains but essentially turns a willful blind eye away from any activism and self-examination about this "culture of death." From his work in the third world his mysticism was nurtured and grounded within Liberation Theology which was born and developed in the 20th century in the poorest, most oppressed and ignored areas in third world countries. Globally powerful religious institutions intent on impacting peoples personal morality while not focusing upon and emphasizing focus social and economic justice, not taking care of the poor, "the least of these among you" , he found himself becoming more and more bitter in bloated America.

"My bile is actually a healthy response to what is going on. It's just that I don't have the venues now as an older man that I would have had as a younger, healthier, more resilient man. I'm also humiliated to find that at my age I would be depressed and stuck. I'm not happy though happiness ala capitalist America is not my goal here. Meaningful living with what you, Warren, call the "givens of existence" is enough for me. One takes comfort and gives comfort where one can but I'm in this damned dark night of the soul; at least, NOT the one I expected. Damn it!"

I immediately recalled the last paragraph in Jung's autobiography, Memories, Dreams, Reflections.

"Will, if we work together I must now warn you that you will hear me speak much of Carl Jung. And I may read a bit of him here and there outloud to you if he seems pertinent and you are game. Jung may fit here if you allow me to read just a paragraph, the last, in his biography."

"I'm game. Read."

Keeping my Jung books near at hand I easily found the book and began to read:
When Lao-tzu says: "All are clear, I alone am clouded," he is
expressing what I now feel in advanced old age. Lao-tzu is the
example of a man with superior insight who has seen and ex-
perienced worth and worthlessness, and who at the end of his
life desires to return into his own being, into the eternal un-
knowable meaning. The archetype of the old man who has seen
enough is eternally true. At every level of intelligence this type
appears, and its lineaments are always the same, whether it be
an old peasant or a great philosopher like Lao-tzu. This is old
age, and a limitation. Yet there is so much that fills me: plants,
animals, clouds, day and night, and the eternal in man. The
more uncertain I have felt about my
self, the more there has
grown up in me a feeling of kinship with all things. In fact it
seems to me as if that alienation which so long separated me
from the world has become transferred into my own inner world,
and has revealed to me an unexpected unfamiliarity with myself.


[To be continued. I am currently working
on more about Father Will soon to be
published here.]




*********************************

Appendix One:

[The following, excerpts of a letter by the Dalai Lama,
is quoted from James Hillman's book, The Puer Papers,
Spring Publications Inc, 1979 pg. 59.]

"...The relation of height to spiritualitity is not merely
metaphorical. It is a physical reality. The most spirit-
ual people on the planet live in the highest places. So
do the most spiritual flowers...I call the high and the
light aspects of my being spirit and the dark and heavy
aspect soul.

Soul is at home in the deep, shaded valleys. Heavy torpid
flowers saturated with black grow there. The river flows
like warm syrup. They empty into huge oceans of soul.

Spirit is a land of high, white peaks and glittering jewel-
like lakes and flowers. Life is sparse and sounds travel
great distances.

There is soul music, soul food, soul dancing, and soul
love...

When the soul triumphed, the herdsmen came to the lama-
series, for soul is communal and loves humming in unison.
But the creative soul craves spirit. Out of the jungles
of the lamasery, the most beautiful monks one day bid fare-
well to their comrades and go make their solitary journey
toward the peaks, there to mate with the cosmos...

No spirit broods over the lofty desolation; for desolation
is of the depths, as is brooding. At these heights,
spirit leaves soul far behind...

People need to climb the mountain not simply because it is
there but because the soulful divinity needs to be mated
with the spirit...[abbreviated]" END

Hillman's comments immediately following the Dalai Lama's
letter amplify the use of peaks/spirit and vale/soul:

May I point out one or two little curiosities in this
letter. They may help us to see the further contrast be-
tween soul and spirit. First, did you notice how import-
ant it is to be literal and not "merely metaphorical"
when one takes the spiritual viewpoint? Also, this view-
point requires the physical sensation pf height, of
"highs." Then, did you see that it is the most beauti-
ful monks who leave their brothers, and that their mating
is with the cosmos, a mating that is compared with snow?
...And finally, have you noticed the two sorts of anima
symbolism: the dark, heavy, torpid flowers by the rivers
of warm syrup and the virginal petaled flowers of the
glaciers?

...We can recognize what is spiritual by its style of
imagery and language; so with soul. To give definitions
of spirit and soul -- the one abstract, unified, concen-
trated; the other concrete, multiple, immanent -- puts
the distinction and the problem into language of spirit."

**********************************

Appendix Two

This extended quote from the old British Isles region and
religion in which great happiness is taken about the
dark, they who dwell aware of the shadows within and round
about, the mysterious and dubious forces which expand us
with fear, awe and if endured, happiness, authentic
happiness which embraces pathos for these dark ones
inhabit us, concern us and our well-being in terms of
psychic wholeness, as well.

I 'hoppin'ed 'pon this' while researching the etymology
of the word 'happy', an extended entry upon the word hobbit
in which whilst reading I felt extremely happy to happen
haphazardly upon as luck would have it. Be sure to read the
entire list. Some great names to call people!!! Here is
the link to what is below:

[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=
happiness&searchmode=none]

"Hobbit Look up Hobbit at Dictionary.com
1937, coined in the fantasy tales of J.R.R. Tolkien (1892-1973).
"Hobbit is an invention. In the Westron the word used, when the people was referred to at all, was banakil 'halfling.' But ... the folk of the Shire and of Bree used the word kuduk .... It seems likely that kuduk was a worn-down form of kûd-dûkan [='hole-dweller']. The latter I have translated ... by holbytla ['hole-builder']; and hobbit provides a word that might well be a worn-down form of holbytla, if the name had occurred in our ancient language." [Tolkien, "Return of the King," 1955, p.416]
"On a blank leaf I scrawled: 'In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit.' I did not and do not know why." [Tolkien, letter to W.H. Auden, dated 1955]
The word also turns up in a very long list of folkloric supernatural creatures in the writings of Michael Aislabie Denham (d.1859), printed in volume 2 of "The Denham Tracts" [ed. James Hardy, London: Folklore Society, 1895], a compilation of Denham's scattered publications. Denham was an early folklorist who concentrated on Northumberland, Durham, Westmoreland, Cumberland, the Isle of Man, and Scotland.
"What a happiness this must have been seventy or eighty years ago and upwards, to those chosen few who had the good luck to be born on the eve of this festival of all festivals; when the whole earth was so overrun with ghosts, boggles, bloody-bones, spirits, demons, ignis fatui, brownies, bugbears, black dogs, specters, shellycoats, scarecrows, witches, wizards, barguests, Robin-Goodfellows, hags, night-bats, scrags, breaknecks, fantasms, hobgoblins, hobhoulards, boggy-boes, dobbies, hob-thrusts, fetches, kelpies, warlocks, mock-beggars, mum-pokers, Jemmy-burties, urchins, satyrs, pans, fauns, sirens, tritons, centaurs, calcars, nymphs, imps, incubuses, spoorns, men-in-the-oak, hell-wains, fire-drakes, kit-a-can-sticks, Tom-tumblers, melch-dicks, larrs, kitty-witches, hobby-lanthorns, Dick-a-Tuesdays, Elf-fires, Gyl-burnt-tales, knockers, elves, rawheads, Meg-with-the-wads, old-shocks, ouphs, pad-foots, pixies, pictrees, giants, dwarfs, Tom-pokers, tutgots, snapdragons, sprets, spunks, conjurers, thurses, spurns, tantarrabobs, swaithes, tints, tod-lowries, Jack-in-the-Wads, mormos, changelings, redcaps, yeth-hounds, colt-pixies, Tom-thumbs, black-bugs, boggarts, scar-bugs, shag-foals, hodge-pochers, hob-thrushes, bugs, bull-beggars, bygorns, bolls, caddies, bomen, brags, wraiths, waffs, flay-boggarts, fiends, gallytrots, imps, gytrashes, patches, hob-and-lanthorns, gringes, boguests, bonelesses, Peg-powlers, pucks, fays, kidnappers, gallybeggars, hudskins, nickers, madcaps, trolls, robinets, friars' lanthorns, silkies, cauld-lads, death-hearses, goblins, hob-headlesses, bugaboos, kows, or cowes, nickies, nacks necks, waiths, miffies, buckies, ghouls, sylphs, guests, swarths, freiths, freits, gy-carlins Gyre-carling, pigmies, chittifaces, nixies, Jinny-burnt-tails, dudmen, hell-hounds, dopple-gangers, boggleboes, bogies, redmen, portunes, grants, hobbits, hobgoblins, brown-men, cowies, dunnies, wirrikows, alholdes, mannikins, follets, korreds, lubberkins, cluricauns, kobolds, leprechauns, kors, mares, korreds, puckles korigans, sylvans, succubuses, blackmen, shadows, banshees, lian-hanshees, clabbernappers, Gabriel-hounds, mawkins, doubles, corpse lights or candles, scrats, mahounds, trows, gnomes, sprites, fates, fiends, sibyls, nicknevins, whitewomen, fairies, thrummy-caps, cutties, and nisses, and apparitions of every shape, make, form, fashion, kind and description, that there was not a village in England that had not its own peculiar ghost. Nay, every lone tenement, castle, or mansion-house, which could boast of any antiquity had its bogle, its specter, or its knocker. The churches, churchyards, and crossroads were all haunted. Every green lane had its boulder-stone on which an apparition kept watch at night. Every common had its circle of fairies belonging to it. And there was scarcely a shepherd to be met with who had not seen a spirit!"
[Emphasis added] It is curious that the name occurs nowhere else in folklore, and there is no evidence that Tolkien ever saw this."
Important to note that as pertaining pathological happiness, to pathos and pathology in particular, that Tolkien's first note about hobbits is that they live in holes in the ground which is underworld imagery, the place of the dark, the hidden, the mysterious and tricksterish forces. Suffer, the word etymologically means 'to undergo', sub = under, ferre = go, carry. It can mean "under carriage", that part of a cart or car which carries and sustains the weight of the cabin above it. Hobbits are known to be innately happy creatures (see my William James reference in the text below re: 'healthy minded religion' about tempermentally people with positive dispositions. The shadow of hobbits, healthy-minded one, to use James' term, is 'sick-minded', those innately aware of shadow and the pathos dimensions of being. The entire hobbit series can be seen as a hobbit's individuation process of integrating the shadow, pathos, sick-minded aspects of self naturally in the unconscious of those predispostioned to "healthy-mindedness". That hobbits live in holes in the ground belies the as yet to be made conscious awareness and integration of the depth dimensions, the pathos dimensions of existence. But I am ahead of what lies beneath this beginning. I'm in the hole already. Proceed with all the listed nether beings above to accompany you.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

This Terribly Significant Business of Other People---Group Work & Getting It Wrong & Wrong & Wrong Again

[Is this an image of group therapy or the Jerry Springer show? Group dynamics in any context, sacred or secular, appears still to be pretty much the same as it was in classical times; the best depiction of group dynamics as I've experienced them so far. Please click to enlarge the image in order to see all the various sub-groups and reactions, especially the two men in the mid-left edge of the painting. I am seeking the name and artist of this painting in order to give it its legal attributions. If anyone knows the artist then please inform me so I may publish all the legal copyright information. Thank you.

I use extensive quotes here, the most important part of all that follows, as they elucidate and educate regarding group dynamics, all said so much better than I. Regarding groups I am still pretty much inarticulate or, rather, choose to remain more silent than vocal since I have very strong and mostly negative views from my personal experience of groups and their bleeders, I mean, leaders. However, I am not just silent here or in groups but work very hard in my own analysis and inner work to understand and if possible mature in terms of my expectations and experiences of groups.

That said, I would write and publish an "Introverts for Extraverted Dummies Who Run Groups" book for it is usually extraverts who find group work positively numinous whereas introverts find group work negatively so expecially in the extraverted pull for public display and show of internals, vicera, vice, vomit and vox umbilical. I write more about this way, way below what follows if the reader is at all interested.]

defense 1297, from O.Fr. defens, from L. defensum "thing protected or forbidden," from neut. pp. of defendere "ward off, protect"


My nervous system is better than your nervous system.
My nervous system hates your nervous system.
Keep your nervous system away from mine and all betwixt n between the pond and the blue pines. Needles, the word. And spine.
"The nerve!" you say,
"Stick 'em where the sun don't shine."

-- from Gator Trees a 'Coon Behind the Moon and Other Myths of Reptiles and Prehensiles North and South by Wilfred O. Bung (unpublished manuscript)


You fight your superficiality, your shallowness, so as to try to come at people without unreal expectations, without an overload of bias or hope or arrogance, as untanklike as you can be, sans cannon and machine guns and steel plating half a foot thick; you come at them unmenacingly on your own ten toes instead of tearing up the turf with your caterpillar treads, take them with an open mind, as equals, man to man, as we used to say, and yet you never fail to get them wrong. You might as well have the brain of a tank. You get them wrong before you meet them, while you're anticipating meeting them; you get them wrong while you're with them; and then you go home to tell somebody else about the meeting and you get them all wrong again. Since the same generally goes for them with you, the whole thing is really a dazzling illusion empty
of all perception, an astonishing farce of misperception. And yet what are we to do about this terribly significant business of other people, which gets bled of the significance we think it has and takes on instead a significance that is ludicrous, so ill-equipped are we all to envision one another's interior workings and invisible aims? Is everyone to go off and lock the door and sit secluded like the lonely writers do, in a soundproof cell, summoning people out of words and then proposing that these word people are closer to the real thing than the real people that we mangle with our ignorance every day? The fact remains that getting people right is not what living is all about anyway. It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again. That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong. Maybe the best thing would be to forget being right or wrong about people and just go along for the ride. But if you can do that--well, lucky you.

-- from Amercian Pastoral, a novel
by Philip Roth, p. 35


The soul selects her own society,
Then shuts the door;
On her divine majority
Obtrude no more.

Unmoved, she notes the chariot's pausing
At her low gate;
Unmoved, an emperor is kneeling
Upon her mat.

I've known her from an ample nation
Choose one;
Then close the valves of her attention
Like stone.

-- Emily Dickinson

Our lives teach us who we are. I have learned the hard way that when you permit anyone else's description of reality to supplant your own-- and such descriptions have been raining down on me, from security advisers, governments, journalists, Archbishops, friends, enemies, mullahs--then you might as well be dead. Obviously, a rigid, blinkered absolutist world view is the easiest to keep hold of, whereas the fluid, uncertain, metamorphic picture I've always carried is rather more vulnerable. Yet I must cling with all my might to my own soul; must hold on to its mischievous, iconoclastic, out-of-step clown instincts, no matter how great the storm. And if that plunges me into contradiction and paradox, so be it; I've lived in that messy ocean all my life.

-- from "Our Lives Teach Us Who We Are" by Salmon Rushdie quoted by Clark Moustakis, preface, p.xxi, Being-In, Being-For, Being-With


["In Bion's view, then, what matters in individual and group behaviour is more primitive than the Freudian level of explanation. The ultimate sources of our distress are psychotic anxieties, and much of what happens in individuals and groups is a result of defenses erected against psychotic anxieties, so that we do not have to endure them consciously."

The above and following extensive quote from Robert M. Young's essay "Psychotic Anxieties in Groups and Institutions" is necessary for a psychoanalytic understanding of group dynamics and how fraught with destructive capabilities they are. Young articulates clearly and personally some of these unconscious dynamics present in all groups. If anyone is interested in getting together to read and discuss this essay more deeply please contact me for I am 'most anxious' to do so.
I highly recommend an intensive study and discussion of this article for all who are in groups, run groups or fancy that they would like to do so. Click here for the article (amongst many excellent ones meriting serious study and discussion:

http://www.psychoanalysis-and-therapy.com/human_nature/papers/paper22h.html
]


...My general point is that if you ask the question, 'What is a psychotic anxiety when it's at home and not in the pages of an implausible and nearly unfathomable text by Melanie Klein?', you'll be able to be less sceptical if you interrogate the fringes of your own memories and distressing experiences and, of course, your dreams [see my "Rat Cassoullet" dream exposited further below]. I shall offer more illustrations anon, but for the present I want to assert that psychotic anxieties are ubiquitous, underlie all thought, provide the rationale for all culture and institutions and, in particular cases, help us to make sense of especially galling ways of being. I have in mind at the moment Meltzer's idea of the claustrum, wherein dwell ultra-ambitious and survivalist conformists who live in projective identification, which he takes to mean that their dwelling place in the inner world is inside the rectum, thus confirming the colloquial description of such people as 'arseholes'...

My own experience involved feeling continually on the edge of disintegration as a result of what happened in the various group events (ranging in size from a dozen to over 100 people) which I found appalling and from which there seemed no escape, while efforts to persuade people to behave well produced flight, sadism collusive lowering of the stakes or denial. The potential of the group for uniting around (what was called on occasion) 'cheap reconciliation' or for cruelty, brought me to the point of leaving at several points, and I frequently had the experience of having to use all my resources to hold myself together against forces which I experienced as profoundly immoral, amoral or pathetically conformist. No appeal to standards of group decency was of much avail.

I ended up forming a group in my mind which consisted of all the people I admired in history and in my lifetime, e.g., Socrates, Lincoln, Gandhi, King, Bonhoeffer, Marcuse, Mandela, who had stood up to intolerable social forces without quitting the field or having their spirits broken. I dubbed this 'The PSÖD Solidarity Group' and, armed with their mandate, managed to talk my way into a meeting with the staff, for the purpose of mounting a critique of the rubric of the exercise. I felt contained by the inner solidarity provided by my imagined group, while I was, in truth, actually on my own in the phenomenal context of the conference events. I had blown out of a group in considerable distress, because it had utterly failed to live up to its self-designation of advocating and practising decency and civility among its members and urging such standards on the larger group of conference members.

Just as I was on the point of sitting down to confront the staff group in the name of my inner world group (vainly hoping they would show some interest in its name, membership and values), a representative of the group I had left appeared and bestowed 'plenipotentiary powers' (one of the designated forms of delegation of authority) on me, freeing me from the dreaded status of 'singleton'. A singleton is a person with no role status in he large group (see Miller, 1990, p. 179 and Turquet, 1975, where the plight of the singleton is insightfully and poignantly described). I had felt unutterably alone, almost totally in the grip of paranoid persecutions, holding on for dear life to my hallucinated historical group. The bestowal of my conference group's trust reincorporated me into the social whole on terms I could accept.

My confrontation with the staff group, acting in this exercise as 'Management, was predictably without issue, but I went away feeling that I had spoken my piece without suffering the humiliation that many others had experienced. I had offered my analysis of the situation and their role in it, one dimension of which was that they would - as a part of the exercise's point - continue to behave as that were doing, i.e., act as an immovable object on to which the groups would project their phantasies about authority and (hopefully) begin to take responsibility for themselves. I felt that I had done that and negotiated my own rite of passage - just.

Having gone some way toward resolving my own temporary insanity (though not my omnipotence or my paranoia, which included the belief that the conference Director had slept with my partner) I was only able to bask pleasantly in group membership for a few minutes before members of another group, who had sought refuge in being regressed and silly (they called themselves 'The Potty Training Group'), stormed into the room where the staff/Management group were holding court. The person whom I had considered to be the mildest member of that group proceeded to physically attack a German member of staff with shouts of 'fascist' and other violent epithets. He was aided and cheered on by other members of his group, until one, a woman I felt sure was a Jew but I now recollect was probably not but was a German, broke down sobbing and shouted for all this to stop.

The descent from work or task-oriented groups to groups in the thrall of psychotic basic assumptions is, as Bion pointed out, spontaneous and inevitable, even in a situation which all concerned know to be temporary and 'artificial'. I continue to find this profoundly sobering. I also continue to ruminate it and am far from having digested the experience, though I have found it increasingly helpful in my work and related activities - and in my reflections on what has happened in recent politics, especially the people on the left who have tried to work in relatively non-hierarchical groups [spiritually oriented "leftist groups" take heed. This related point a little further in the essay:

Menzies Lyth also draws a cautionary conclusion: 'In general, it may be postulated that resistance to social change is likely to be greatest in institutions whose social defence systems are dominated by primitive psychic defence mechanisms, those which have been collectively described by Klein as the paranoid-schizoid defences' (Menzies Lyth, p. 79). In recent reflections on her work and that of her colleagues, she has reiterated just how refractory to change institutions are (Menzies Lyth, 1988, pp. 1-42, and personal communications). It is obvious to me that these findings apply across the society and culture and to left organizations particularly, where the risks of going against the grain of hegemony can often feel life-threatening and in some societies are.].

After canvassing the literature on psychotic anxieties and reflecting on it and my own personal, clinical and political experience, I am left with a daunting sense of the power of the inner world and an awesome awareness of how very deep, primitive, abiding and alarming its nether regions are. The anxieties I have attempted to outline (and, to a degree, evoke), exist throughout human nature - in all of life from the cradle (some say earlier) to the grave, in all of play and culture, and act as a brake on benignity and social change which it is hard to imagine releasing, even notch by notch.

The history of psychoanalysis has left us with a small number of ideas about the veneer of civilisation. Freud said it was thin and under threat. One reading of those who still speak in his name and quote his slogan: 'Where id was, there ego shall be. It is a work of culture - not unlike the draining of the Zuider Zee' (S.E. 22, p. 80), takes this to mean that the result can be a dry, flowering land, i.e., that there can be a 'conflict-free sphere of the ego'. A second, rather disparate, group proffer a continuum extending from Reich's advocacy of desublimation and a promise of a return to Eden, to the Winnicottian position that eschews Klein's undoubted stress on the power of thantic, destructive forces, and sees rather more decency and hope in liberal society than the Kleinians discern.

I dare say that Klein wrote rather less about the other side of human nature - the constructive or erotic impulses - because she found herself in mutually critical dialogue with colleagues who she felt overemphasised those aspects. Finding the twig bent, as she thought, too far one way, she bent it the other way, perhaps to leave it straight for those that followed. A third group are orthodox Kleinians and point out that the veneer of civilisation is very thin indeed and that the maelstrom beneath is perpetually and rather pathetically defended against. It can be argued that this provides the basis for a psychoanalytic rendering of Gramsci's optimism of the will, coupled with a pessimism of the intellect and, I say again, a belief that it is essential to know what is bubbling away underneath the surface if we are to have any hope of cooling some of the crust and sharing some of the fruits of human endeavour more equitably.

I also believe that this position is consistent with a careful reading of Freud's Civilisation and Its Discontents, written half way through his sixteen-year struggle with cancer. He says there that the history of civilisation is 'the struggle between Eros and Death, between the instinct of life and the instinct of destruction, as it works itself out in the human species. This struggle is what all life essentially consists of... And it is this battle of the giants that our nurse-maids try to appease with their lullaby about Heaven' (S.E. 21, p. 122).

In conclusion, my view of the connection between psychoanalysis, therapy and institutional and social change - and the impediments to change - is that human nature is far more ambivalent and refractory at a much deeper level than we ever imagine when we embark on changing the world. As I have said before, I find myself thinking increasingly of Sisyphus, whom Albert Camus urged us to imagine as happy. Perhaps he comforts himself with the stoical maxim: 'It is not given to us to complete the task, yet we may not give it up'.


[What follows is part of a review of theories regarding individuals in group dynamics from the same article by Young]

In an attempt to shed some light on all this, I want to gather together and draw attention to the implications of Kleinian and neo-Kleinian ideas for how we think of human nature, by which I mean, with respect to individuals and all other levels of culture and civilisation. It turns out that defence against psychotic anxieties is offered by Kleinians as a deeper explanation than the incest taboo as the basis of that thin and all too easily breached veneer that constitutes civility and stands between what passes for the social order, on the one hand, and chaos (or the fear of it), on the other. This turns out to be a mixed blessing, since our defences against psychotic anxieties act as a powerful brake on institutional and social change toward less rigid and more generous relations between individuals and groups. Those of you who are familiar with this literature will not hear anything new. My aim is to think as hard as I can about what it would mean to take its conclusions seriously.

Freud's theory of civilisation drew attention to the taboo against violent sexual competitiveness and rapaciousness as the corner-stone of civilisation. The polymorphously sexual patriarch was said to have been killed by the primal horde, thus establishing the incest taboo, the basis for all other taboos and the system of custom and legality that gave birth to civilisation and culture, terms Freud refused to distinguish. He constantly emphasised that 'man is a wolf to other men', that the veneer of civilisation is thin and under threat from moment to moment and that all of life is a constant struggle conducted in the fraught space between erotic and destructive instincts. For Freud the basic conflicts occurred at this level of the psyche (see Young, 1992, ch. 2). As Meltzer describes it, Freud's world is 'a world of higher animals', 'creatures seeking surcease from the constant bombardment of stimuli from inside and out'. He contrasts Klein's world as 'one of holy babes in holy families plagued by the devils of split off death instinct' (Meltzer, 1978, part 3, pp. 115-16).

This is not merely a difference of emphasis. The difference between the worlds of Freud and Klein may also be described as one of level of explanation and of causality. Bion put the point clearly in the conclusion to his essay, 'Group Dynamics - A Re-view', which, as Menzies Lyth points out, was more explicit about the Kleinian inspiration of his ideas than his better-known collection of essays, Experiences in Groups. Bion says, 'Freud's view of the dynamics of the group seems to me to require supplementing rather than correction' (Bion, 1955, p. 475). He accepts Freud's claim that the family group is the basis for all groups but adds that 'this view does not go far enough... I think that the central position in group dynamics is occupied by the more primitive mechanisms which Melanie Klein has described as peculiar to the paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions. In other words, I feel... that it is not simply a matter of the incompleteness of the illumination provided by Freud's discovery of the family group as the prototype of all groups, but the fact that this incompleteness leaves out the source of the main emotional drives of the group' (ibid.). He then summarises the notions of 'work group' and the 'basic assumptions' that assail them - 'dependence', 'pairing', 'fight-flight' - and suggests that these may have a common link or may be different aspects of each other.

'Further investigation shows that each basic assumption contains features that correspond so closely with extremely primitive part objects that sooner or later psychotic anxiety, appertaining to these primitive relationships, is released. These anxieties, and the mechanisms peculiar to them, have already been displayed in psychoanalysis by Melanie Klein, and her descriptions tally well with the emotional states' of the basic assumption group. Such groups have aims 'far different either from the overt task of the group or even from the tasks that would appear to be appropriate to Freud's view of the group as based on the family group. But approached from the angle of psychotic anxiety, associated with phantasies of primitive part object relationships... the basic assumption phenomena appear far more to have the characteristics of defensive reactions to psychotic anxiety, and to be not so much at variance with Freud's views as supplementary to them. In my view, it is necessary to work through both the stresses that appertain to family patterns and the still more primitive anxieties of part object relationships. In fact I consider the latter to contain the ultimate sources of all group behaviour' (p. 476).

In Bion's view, then, what matters in individual and group behaviour is more primitive than the Freudian level of explanation. The ultimate sources of our distress are psychotic anxieties, and much of what happens in individuals and groups is a result of defences erected against psychotic anxieties, so that we do not have to endure them consciously.


[Group dynamics and psychotic anxieties in the following famous story by Uncle Remus. Briar patch group meets the Trickster archetype played against Itself between Brer Rabbit and Brer Fox. The group is the briar patch, the tricks of group techniques are designed for such encounters between the Tar Baby and Brer Rabbit headed for a show down with Brer Fox who is the group leader. The psychotic anxieties are shared by one and all in various permutations. The tar baby, the non-participant group member, drives both Brer Rabbit and, ultimately, Brer Fox mad with anxiety and rage. In the end, though, Brer Rabbit has the capacity for some growth in awareness imaged in his sitting on a log combing the tar out of his fur with a wood chip and looking smug." The Tar Baby is also the shadow of individuals, the group and the group leader. Brer Rabbit will most likely defeat Brer Fox because of his capacity to directly encounter his shadow, engage it, learn from it and assimilate/integrate it into conscious use.]

Brer Rabbit meets a Tar Baby
retold by
S. E. Schlosser

Well now, that rascal Brer Fox hated Brer Rabbit on account of he was always cutting capers and bossing everyone around. So Brer Fox decided to capture and kill Brer Rabbit if it was the last thing he ever did! He thought and he thought until he came up with a plan. He would make a tar baby! Brer Fox went and got some tar and he mixed it with some turpentine and he sculpted it into the figure of a cute little baby. Then he stuck a hat on the Tar Baby and sat her in the middle of the road.

Brer Fox hid himself in the bushes near the road and he waited and waited for Brer Rabbit to come along. At long last, he heard someone whistling and chuckling to himself, and he knew that Brer Rabbit was coming up over the hill. As he reached the top, Brer Rabbit spotted the cute little Tar Baby. Brer Rabbit was surprised. He stopped and stared at this strange creature. He had never seen anything like it before!

"Good Morning," said Brer Rabbit, doffing his hat. "Nice weather we're having."

The Tar Baby said nothing. Brer Fox laid low and grinned an evil grin. Brer Rabbit tried again.

"And how are you feeling this fine day?" The Tar Baby, she said nothing.

Brer Fox grinned an evil grin and lay low in the bushes.

Brer Rabbit frowned. This strange creature was not very polite. It was beginning to make him mad.

"Ahem!" said Brer Rabbit loudly, wondering if the Tar Baby were deaf. "I said 'HOW ARE YOU THIS MORNING?"

The Tar Baby said nothing.

Brer Fox curled up into a ball to hide his laugher. His plan was working perfectly!

"Are you deaf or just rude?" demanded Brer Rabbit, losing his temper. "I can't stand folks that are stuck up! You take off that hat and say 'Howdy-do' or I'm going to give you such a lickin'!"

The Tar Baby just sat in the middle of the road looking as cute as a button and saying nothing at all.

Brer Fox rolled over and over under the bushes, fit to bust because he didn't dare laugh out loud.

"I'll learn ya!" Brer Rabbit yelled. He took a swing at the cute little Tar Baby and his paw got stuck in the tar.

"Lemme go or I'll hit you again," shouted Brer Rabbit. The Tar Baby, she said nothing.

"Fine! Be that way," said Brer Rabbit, swinging at the Tar Baby with his free paw. Now both his paws were stuck in the tar, and Brer Fox danced with glee behind the bushes.

"I'm gonna kick the stuffin' out of you," Brer Rabbit said and pounced on the Tar Baby with both feet. They sank deep into the Tar Baby. Brer Rabbit was so furious he head-butted the cute little creature until he was completely covered with tar and unable to move.

Brer Fox leapt out of the bushes and strolled over to Brer Rabbit. "Well, well, what have we here?" he asked, grinning an evil grin.

Brer Rabbit gulped. He was stuck fast. He did some fast thinking while Brer Fox rolled about on the road, laughing himself sick over Brer Rabbit's dilemma.

"I've got you this time, Brer Rabbit," said Brer Fox, jumping up and shaking off the dust. "You've sassed me for the very last time. Now I wonder what I should do with you?"

Brer Rabbit's eyes got very large. "Oh please Brer Fox, whatever you do, please don't throw me into the briar patch."

"Maybe I should roast you over a fire and eat you," mused Brer Fox. "No, that's too much trouble. Maybe I'll hang you instead."

"Roast me! Hang me! Do whatever you please," said Brer Rabbit. "Only please, Brer Fox, please don't throw me into the briar patch."

"If I'm going to hang you, I'll need some string," said Brer Fox. "And I don't have any string handy. But the stream's not far away, so maybe I'll drown you instead."

"Drown me! Roast me! Hang me! Do whatever you please," said Brer Rabbit. "Only please, Brer Fox, please don't throw me into the briar patch."

"The briar patch, eh?" said Brer Fox. "What a wonderful idea! You'll be torn into little pieces!"

Grabbing up the tar-covered rabbit, Brer Fox swung him around and around and then flung him head over heels into the briar patch. Brer Rabbit let out such a scream as he fell that all of Brer Fox's fur stood straight up. Brer Rabbit fell into the briar bushes with a crash and a mighty thump. Then there was silence.

Brer Fox cocked one ear toward the briar patch, listening for whimpers of pain. But he heard nothing. Brer Fox cocked the other ear toward the briar patch, listening for Brer Rabbit's death rattle. He heard nothing.

Then Brer Fox heard someone calling his name. He turned around and looked up the hill.

Brer Rabbit was sitting on a log combing the tar out of his fur with a wood chip and looking smug.

"I was bred and born in the briar patch, Brer Fox," he called. "Born and bred in the briar patch."

And Brer Rabbit skipped away as merry as a cricket while Brer Fox ground his teeth in rage and went home.

-- from Spooky South by S.E. Schlosser Click here for the website with this story:

http://www.americanfolklore.net/folktales/ga2.html


--------------------------------------------

Monday, February 2, 2009

Fittingly Beside the Belfry -- Pere Bleubols Ponders Good & Evil In The New Age In Voices Severally


[from Pissoirs Du Mal, Le Journal Des Les Moineaux (Urinals of Evil, The Journal of the Sparrows), from the dust jacket, the photo and the blurb beneath:

"Ah! It is Beginning Fittingly Beside the Belfry, Priest shirt on, rakishly unbuttoned, God Maddened Pere Bleubols Ponders Good and Evil in the New Age Near the Virgin Blue Garbage Can, Refuse of God Talk through the Ages O'reflowing Beside, and Betide, Les Rouge Fleurs du Mal...

He's swell. He's a pal to the mages. Nevermind his rages. Remind him to pack his socks and to tie his shoes...

The Quest? To Rescue Dante But Not To Redeem Him,
For THAT, Dear and Fellow Peregrinator, He Must Do Himself."]

[If you wish to read the section, Jung's "Cloud-Cuckoo-Land" in Context before what immediately follows below this then scroll down until you come to it. This section is where the Learning For Life Group newsletter article is taken. I hasten to say that the fictional/frictional dramatic dialogue content immediately after the dedication and epigrams below expresses my own contradictory and passionate views du jour and do not reflect the views of my colleagues of LFL Group. This blogspot format offers me a chance to express myself in many ways and what follows is one of them, more raw, less censored, and chasing, as always, my own tail, and perhaps a god tale, as earnestly and authentically as I can, imperfect as it all is and ever shall be.

I'd rate this on an ascending scale from low to high volume from 1 to 10 as a 10 on the "Rant-o-meter" so be forewarned. As my favorite philosophy professor at the Christian college often said, rather new to Christianity and not familiar with the linguistic tourettes required to truly be a member of the God's Own Club,

"If I sound bitter it's because I am."

B
ombaste.]


For Betsy Steele Halpern, Jungian analyst, who died April 3, 2008 :


My first analyst, she had much work cut out for her for I was "a lost fart in a thunderstorm" freshly tossed up from "the Christ-haunted landscape" of the American South. I should have bought her a necklace of pearls as a gift to her when I impatiently parted the analysis not realizing then that I had already started the Descent by heading off heedless, arrogant, headlong and as desperate as Rimbaud "to worship at any shrine impulses toward perfection." Thank you, Betsy, for releasing me to my fate "into the fluff" you called the New Age movement with your authentic blessing. I return to the beginning yet again, humbled, a sinner still, swilling away, an ass but more honestly so, bare assed and embarassed for the lint of the New Age fluff tenaciously, cloyingly clinging still to me bum. I clutch my January 25, 2008 dream of nakedness as I left the collapsed New Age altar having grabbed a Swiss beer stein called an alpenstein, translated, white stone ("white" (alpen) "stone" (stein)) from it as it crashed down with all its gods and symbols, gurus and priestesses in a wintery cold heap beneath the spiritual decay and rubble. En exilio yet again, I then and now seek 1) to get some clothes on departing the debris and, 2) to understand and honor the alspenstein-white stone with the help of Carl Jung and others, and begin the limping journey anew which you helped me launch in 1981 or 82. Here I go now more hunchbacked than ever, a gargoyle ledge-sitter " 'ponst my haunches" quoting King James verses for the love of the music and what was/is hinted therein them -- that Silence of God which makes me babble so.

"No, no, no, no! Come, let's away to prison:
We two alone will sing like birds i' the cage:
When thou dost ask me blessing, I'll kneel down,
And ask of thee forgiveness: so we'll live,
And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh
At gilded butterflies, and hear poor rogues
Talk of court news; and we'll talk with them too,
Who loses and who wins; who's in, who's out;
And take upon's the mystery of things,
As if we were God's spies: and we'll wear out,
In a walled prison, packs and sects of great ones,
That ebb and flow by the moon." -- King Lear, in King Lear by William Shakespeare


Selah.



-----------------------------------------------------


The universe is simplified since he summarized it as a rumor in an empty shell. -- George Rodenbach re: the poet Stephan Mallarme


The journey from cloud-cuckoo-land to reality lasted a long time. In my case Pilgrims Progress consisted in my having to climb down a thousand ladders until I could reach out my hand to the little clod of earth that I am. -- Carl Jung


The Indian goal is not moral perfection but the condition of nirvana. He wishes to free himself from nature. In keeping with this aim he seeks in meditation the condition of imagelessness and emptiness. I, on the other hand, wish to persist in a state of lively contemplation of nature and of psychic images. I want to be free neither from human beings nor from myself nor from nature for all these appear to me the greatest of miracles. -- Carl Jung


"Sir, to which sublime tradition do you belong?" [traditional greeting, in ancient times, for strangers coming upon each other at the border of Tibet and China]. -- quoted by J. Marvin Spiegelman, Jungian analyst/writer


In my experience, God prefers what Jung has called the 'natural man' to be a vessel for His 'continuing incarnation' (Answer to Job, par. 746) -- the one who belches and farts and scratches his ass; who is 'a thing despised and rejected by men' (Isaiah 53:3); who is 'a daily laughingstock and the butt of everybody's jokes' (Jeremiah 20:7); who is 'married to a whore' (Hosea 1:2) and nothing more than a stinking goat-herd (Amos 1:1). That is, He prefers the guilty fools and ignoramuses of the world, like you and me, and not, in Jung's words, the 'guiltless ones' like Them -- the learned and the pious 'rabbis' of all religions -- ...[for] according to Jung, 'In them the Dark God would find no room.' -- Reb Yakov Leib HaKohain

One cannot be too cautious in these matters, for what with the imitative urge and a positively morbid avidity to possess themselves of outlandish feathers and deck themselves out in this exotic plumage, far too many people are misled into snatching at such "magical" ideas and applying them externally, like an ointment. People will do anything, no matter how absurd to avoid facing their own souls. -- Carl Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, Collected Works, Vol. 12, par. 126.


We're going to have our bathe in the river, and never mind the crocodiles. -- Carl Jung


***********************************

First Prolegomena To All Future Resistance


"It is night and now do all sleeping fountains wake." -- Zarathustra, in Nietzsche's Thus Spake Zarathustra

A Rule to break: Let sleeping dogs lie. -- Folk saying

A Rule to Follow: "Now, gods, stand up for bastards." -- Edmond, in King Lear by William Shakespeare


Now enter Diogenes Teufelsdrochk (taken from Thomas Carlyle's nom de plume for his satire, Sartor Resartus (The Tailor Retailored). Diogenes in Greek means god begotten. Teufelsdrockh translates from the German as donkey dung".

(God Begotten Donkey Dung blinking awake from sleep) "Damn those fountains! Can't a man sleep for godsakes? Burbling away all night while silent by day!! What was the dream?...ah...yes...










here














in












this













dream
















I have fallen out of heaven. Yea, verily, I have been thrown out by the very deities I tried to play footsies with who acted like they wanted it and then offended angels perceiving me a human rival tossed my fleece socks down upon me as an afterthought. Not a kindness, mind, but an insult to socks and sockitude and what they do. Still, the hurt is and was immense here now hanging on at the familiar perimeter, the Fenetre Fence, recompense for my offending hubris. And all I did was suggest! In the concrete world of Heaven suggestions are creations, coagulate accretions taken for fundamentals. There there is no poetry. No art. A fart becomes instantly too, too solid. Becomes reality creation. Becomes manifest and a curse upon Heaven and Earth for we are tempted to think that whatever is thought is a hard thing. This is a temptation. One of the worst and is an idolatry most foul.

It is the human imagination which is most truly, profoundly creative, with subtleties upon subtleties unfolding, infolding. Resonances unending. Effulgent, ever indulgent in proliferation of World and worlds and gradations never fading except into pastel shades hinting in visual whispers, "There is more..."

Whereas Heaven, Nirvana, icey and cold, is mute. Dumb as a box of hair. Hard as a brainpan.

Overtones and resonance. I tried to bring these to Heaven, along with my socks. Besides, my feet are warm, and Theirs? The Deities'? Cold as purity. Unyielding and smooth as plaster, all shape and shine yet no heat. No warmth at all. There is no place for feet in Heaven. Thus the angels, those feathery toadstools forever floating, all flame and flicker with not even a flint of spark in them, they are symbols perhaps for something Other-than-Matter supposed to convey something of Beyondness to us down here, solid substantial makers of something out of existence in the abjection and the abstraction, imaginations on real fire heating real flesh reaching into and warming many dimensions but let's not do that thing which Heaven does, reify and therefore deify and turn everything stone cold in a second and then call it religion, spirituality.

So much for Heaven's Spiraled Gate where all my life entire I all-too-humanly, always overwrought, have waited looking through the bars, a dumb ox in human form stubbornly staring in, yet again not having learned that once inside the Gate and amongst the Heavenly Company it is not at all as it appears to be from the outside despite the aroma of saffron and sage, myrr and milk.

The roses there have no pricks. But let me tell you, pricks will out!!

The rose petal and gossimer wide skirt of the appointed (usually self-appointed) pope or popette at first billows invitingly as container and sustainer, the very breadth and breath of wisdom, o the power and the glory (dost thou know that glory, gloria etymologically means, reputation? There is much shadow in this but tis disguised by millenia of angels, bloody footless featherdusters, descanting "gloria, gloria in excelsis deo". There's Ego in Heaven after all with such need for singing, nay, insistent repetitive shouting, of Divine Reputation. Boasting, it is. And very unbecoming of Deity...) but, soon, soon, all too soon, the Shadow slithers forth from beneath the Skirt revealing that even Paradise in its heights cannot escape the Law of Compensation and thus that which is in the depths, the repressed and scapegoated Shadow, veritable Lucifer, o'retakes the wings and belfries, even the shade beneath the Throne, O Rorschach, and some one or two or a group become It's emissary and thus the ancient drama of the conflict within God, spread out and played out amongst humans, continues unabated and, until Carl Jung, remains mostly unconscious or, if explained, is rejected as false because the belief is that God, the god-image, is perfect, whole, unblemished and complete. The All Good UH-OH.

Exuent Diogenes Teufelsdrochk.


[An interjection from Harvey Cox regarding New Age capitalism's desacralization of the authentically sacred:

"If there is any fault to be allocated, it lies not with the victims [of commercialization of spiritualities] but with the buyer-seller nexus within which the new Oriental religious wave is marketed. Despite what may be good intentions all around, the consumer mentality can rot the fragile fruits of Eastern spirituality as soon as they are unpacked. The process is both ironic and pathetic. What begins in Benares as a protest against possessiveness ends up in Boston as still another possession. Dark Kali, the great and terrible destroyer, whose very glance can melt the flesh of the strongest warrior, whose slightest breath can stop the pulse and paralyze the soul, finds herself dangling from bracelets with all the other charms.


No deity however terrible, no devotion however deep, no ritual however splendid is exempt from the voracious process of trivialization. The smiling Buddha himself and the worldly-wise Krishna can be transformed by the new gluttony into collectors' trinkets. It was bad enough for King Midas that everything he touched turned to gold; the acquisition-accumulation pattern of the new gluttony does even more. Reversing the alchemist's course, it transforms rubies and emeralds into plastic, the sacred into the silly, the holy into the hokey...(a) changing of the gods into consumer software..." -- pg. 134, Turning East, The Promise and Peril of the New Orientalism, Harvey Cox, Simon and Schuster, 1975.]


'In them the Dark God would find no room.' -- C.G. Jung


In
a 3 a.m. 7 Eleven parking lot, two men sit in an Edsel, shiney red, with decals of flaming fire licking back from the front doors toward the rear. A priest and a striking man cleaning his contacts slurp slushy fruit drinks from paper cups in the front seat.

Pere Bleubols (Pere BB, for short): Here we go again, Loose. I begin again ending in the same refrain (stating as if announcing),

No avoidance of pain works truly.

Is that the theme?

Loose (affectionate moniker for "Lucifer") : Not quite. Don't suffer saying it right for all rites are meant to do that. Faking it sometimes works but in these matters best to play it from the inside out. Leave the tricky stuff to me, "le Tricster, par excellence". And I remind you not to shout. I did not do so when I plummeted to Earth, now "the most odious one", once "the Lover of God". The war, silly humans, is within the Godhead of which I am a part, dangling here where I've been given some play room but must caper, alas, with the likes of you and all the rest "in His image", what C.G. (Jung) describes accurately as "dreary little mirrors" in "His Likeness".

But Big Boom Boom Aboveness hikes His skirts and as young boy C.G. saw, for it was a revelation insisted upon him by Him Himself, finally shits His turd from beneath the celestial throne, clouds departed, crashing down upon the pristine shining Cathedral roof here, as they say, below. Now THAT, my good Pere, is proof of the existence of God! It is the Crap not yet heard around the world. It is the yet to be unfurled Open Stench of the Deity where stupid humans inflatedly think It is their very own but it is slowly sinking in, spreading around, rumors and humours on the wings of blue-assed flies, that the Divine Stinky, says some, this intuited but not yet known aspect of the Divine is about to reveal Itself, that your stinky is It's Stinky and how you humans consciously deal with it instructs Divinty Itself as to Its own Stinkiness and Its Purpose, if that can be divined, maligned, opined as, of course, it can be and is and ever shall be. Turd without end. Amen. [See Carl Jung's Memories, Dreams, Reflections, pgs. 36-42, where Jung gives an account of and commentary upon the vision just described]

Tis but an opinion and yet, hence from this wincing groaning Defecation, out of this Grimacing Heavenly Heaving, comes Alchemy, the only sacred art of your species, twas and tis for Feces' Sake that gold bricks baked, and still do, from Vatican to Fort Knox and back to Vatican again for I am not a fool for the game here is power and all of it that money can buy. And falsity these days is NOT cheap though cheap and false it may be, this Redemption Retailing, this Enlightenment Industry, this Mystery School for the Elected Elite plucking satguru's ashes from midair. But, and I agree with him, CG says, "Yes, wonder of wonders. Miracle of miracles. BUT it is not individuation."

And don't get me going about the Protestants, and the New Agers are no better really, who can't tell gold from a yellow Baptist school bus, who mistake size for value, the bigger the better, the more the merrier until, London Bridges, they all fall down. Graceland bubbas with bad toupes wearing pink panties beneath their three piece suits, , and much to their credit for the anima will out but they ruin it with shame, getting waxed and make-upped for TV revelations straight from His Stinkiness. Please. Too absurd. But not surprised by much at all I am continually stunned at how many varieties of this type, hype and tripe America can twaddle out from the Moloch mills of that entertainment industry which is American Religion from the formal to the fringe for, let's face it, much of what passes for religion and spirituality here is mere entertainment and out like all entertainment to make a buck while elevating some secular or psycho-sacro-saccharin-sanctimonius personality to high priest or highness priestess or now, even more easy and an even faster buck, genie, guru, showman shaman, Chanel channelers of Pleiadians ("but can they plie?") with a yonder far off Indian or Middle Eastern generic twang proclaiming the new millenium of bliss, peace, blessings and bling bling, veritable vats full of Blavatskys churned out of these mills all with personal revelations straight from that Central Star Above, Alprah Centauri. America's greatest contribution after all is it's comics from the White House to the Church House and all in between. And people gladly pay for laughter even as entire civilizations collapse and economies wither. Keep 'em laughing as paradigms shift to fanfare and solar flare, meaning old ones get plastic surgery in L.A., while the gray matter of the brain continues to obediently perpetuate the god-talk du jour. And keep the religion mills' vats full of these Blather-atskys with a dash of so-called ascended masters and a pinch of avatar catargh imported straight from Potage St. Germaine by way, o always, of Atlantis and ever demur of historical fact, Lemuria preceding from some distant star far away.

But seriously folks...

The rough beast of Yeats poem, "The Second Coming" does not slouch toward Bethlehem to be born but emerges from the shopping malls, the cyber-maws, the bestselling jabber jawkeys (lately with an Australian and a German accent) of occult secret masters mostly with non painted on white face (a mostly caucasian movement is the New Age, after all), and promulgated to the masses by a talk show host who can manifest millions of dollars yet not shed or keep off the pounds.

Zounds and gadzooks. Cue the lightningbolts! Shake the thunderclaps. Run out the bull roarers. Some Divine One is angry. And It's followers, too. But which Divine One? There are so many, Henny Penny. The sky has not fallen. Only I have done so.

Pere BB : I can't say all that! It's offensive! It's incendiary! Besides, it's alluded to through the ages in millions dead by purges and plagues, scratched upon bone and chissled in stone. It is all inked upon velum skin, on paper pages, and now etched on TV, movie and computer screens, the realization that Original Sin derives from the Originator and not the first human or ensuing sinner misbegotten in this Divine Comedia:

Seven Eleven, Nine Eleven,
Mundane as dirt is human hurt,
The agonies and the ectomies,
Whole boatloads of them,
All queries and losses.

Human Civilization scurries burying its head up its own arse or some other'n, whilst self-inflated, self-deluded Magikal Kinder Tom Thumbs proudly proclaim... [in a sing songy voice], "Stick in a thumb, pull out a plum, say, "what a good boy am I!!" And they call it manifesting.

Jeez, Loose, I'm starting to sound like you but let me continue cuz I'm on a jelly roll, Morton. [Clears throat loudly, seriously] That despite the distractions, digital and otherwise, the Abyss is completely ignored or simply, ala modern/post-modern hubris, dismissed, slight of hand in a so-called "science of mind", "science of matter" or laughably with a literary deconstruction. Meanwhile the Divine Behind bulges beneath the Celestial Throne and lets go a Big One d'eclairing, "Deconstruct THIS!!"

Ye gods and little fishes know that the Church certainly isn't going to clean up the Mess and the New Age doesn't even see a Mess cuz it's some kinda maya or it's some kinda Mayan apocalypse grinding rapidly down to a halt on a day in December 2012. Perhaps the Church may have to do it after all, at least some tidying up, still so self-absorbed and captured in theological thrall with it all heads up their own Gold skirts and million dollar mitres, thumbs proclaiming, for these baubles do distract, I must say. And it is the Deity, His Minions from Rome to Dallas, that wears Prada and NOT the Devil. It is appalling, really. Alas, you've taught me too well. But then again these thoughts seem to be the inevitable determined productions of time in the turning of the zodiacal wheel.

I need a musical interlude. Mind if I play some Bach? Loose? A cantata or two? The night passes...after all...after the Fall.

"...Strike another match, go start anew...It's all over now, Baby Blue..." sings from the car radio then switches to a CD, Jesu, Priceless Treasure magnificently chorals softly through the car interior, out the open windows into the orange light of the parking lot, mingling in with the oil refinery noise across the fast highway of eighteen wheelers and stragglers weaving home from the bars. Loose puts his contacts in. Tears. From the contacts, he thinks. Or the no contact with Blessed Beloved Turd Ball up above. Smugly above. Damn Him.

[Jungian interjections regarding the one sided notion of an "all Good God":

...
[[This account has]] failed to explain to us clearly what it has done to the Deus absconditus (Jung, The Symbolic Life, par. 1535)

Absconditus means hidden. It is a favorite expression of Jung's -- Deus absconditus, the hidden God. In English, that stem shows up in the verb to abscond. A robber can abscond with the money he has stolen; he steals it and hides it away. The Deus absconditus has that quality: the dark, dangerous, hidden God. Jung is contradicting the...naive notion of [God]. Jung is talking about the living psychological reality, not the theological abstraction. There is a world of difference between those two. Since it [God] is truly dangerous, its containment in a religious institution is indeed desirable as long as that containment works. [So long as it is contained], has been chained up then the religious dimension of [God] has been chained up. One takes orders from the establishment, rather than from the autonomous psychic content, a situation that is safer. In dreams, [God as] the Holy Ghost is signified chiefly by three images: wind, fire, and birds -- especially big birds...

[More Jung] But the action of [god] does not meet us in the atmosphere of the normal, bourgeous (or proletarian!), sheltered, regular life, but only in the insecurity outside human economy, in the infinite spaces [or late night parking lots in parked Edsels], where one is alone with the...providence of God...Like God, then, the unconscious has two aspects: one good, favorable, beneficent, the other evil, malevolent, disastrous. The unconscious is the immediate source of our religious experiences. This psychic nature of all experience does not mean that the transcendental realities are also psychic... (Jung, The Symbolic Life, par. 1538)

The ambivalent nature of the unconscious was presaged in Clement of Rome's notion of the two hands of God...[Jung, regarding prayer]:

In these circumstances it becomes very difficult to know what to make of prayer. Can we address our prayer to the good God to the exclusion of the demon, as Schweitzer recommnends? Have we the power of dissociating God like the country woman who said to the child Jesus, when he interruped her prayer to the Virgin: "Shhh, child, I'm talking to your mother"? Can we really put on one side the God who is dangerous to us? Do we believe that God is so powerless that we can say to him: "Get out, I'm talking to your better half"?...[W]e're going to have our bathe in the river, and never mind the crocodiles." (Jung, ibid. par. 1537)

All quotes above are from pages 94-97 of Edward F. Edinger's, The New God-Image, A Study of Jung's Key Letters Concerning The Evolution of the Western God-Image, Chiron Publications, 1996.]


Loose (sighing then sobering): Once again, Perry (affectionate for Pere), you fail me or at least predict failure and then don't but you are, dear human one, free willed yet fearful of offending. Offense lies heavenward yet is rising in the chest and mind of each human for you all, everyone, are the petri dish, the laboratory for this conflict and confit de Dieu divided betwixt and between Leviathan and God the All Good Mother or Father. Look who you're talking to now, fool. Really, in spite of your self perception, you're lock-faced and unfenced like a cash register with alley cat eyes...You wish to speak of God? Here's your human angel (greek for messenger), Will Shake-n-Bake-Speare, always an advocate for the human, the creaturely, the incarnate, speaking as God (I take Devil's license here to attribute it to God. My will be done, thank you very much:

"To me you cannot reach, you play the spaniel,
and think with wagging of your tongue to win me."

Pere BB (impatiently, urgently): The tongue is all we have. And it has been from the very Beginning about utterance. Utterance is text and context. It is all "In the beginning God..." It is about the wake up out of mute, unknowing, instinct-driven protoplasm into human consciousness what can wiggle its toes willingly in the shoit, can evolve into a conscious creature capable of Buchenwald and Bach, and in time just barely but significantly hold the conflict, bear it so it just may produce what CG calls a transcendent third thing, synthesis born of thesis and antithesis. Silly bunk-filled 'Merican mystics wouldn't know a dialectic if it bit 'em in the astral plane and it does!! There is no consciousness, thank you CG for this, without the opposites. You, Loose, and perhaps Big Boom Boom Abovenss, too, or in cahoots together, or not but it's done, trying to work out the glitch in what He, you, both pitched forth into being with the pots of creation knew exactly what you were doing guaranteeing that there is no stasis above or below but continuing creation, destruction, creation, destruction, always some new unfolding Thing. It is, rather, "In the beginning, or, rather, to begin the Beginning was/is Dialectic..." All the rest flows from this. And if something stands apart from this then we cannot know it for it is wholly other and therefore subject to what? More dialectic which is important yet in the end mere speculation. I am whinnying here, Loose, bear with me, almost done, back to "that Silence which makes me and all of us really babble on. Welcome to human history. Welcome to the history of human consciousness. I paraphrase and distort here, dear Walt Whitman, but "Out of the Cosmic Cradle endlessly crocking." But addle and amble we must. Until exhausted I, we, shush.

(Suddenly, not quite done, as if arguing a case in court before the judge and jury, from Psalm 19)

"The heavens declare the glory of god,
the firmament showeth his handiwork.
Day unto day uttereth speech,
night unto night sheweth knowledge.
There is no speech nor language
where their voice is not heard."

It all becomes utterance and therefore text. I must. I must to the text. Let's not dawdle here any longer. And you're slurping your empty cup is making me crazy, addled. Thus, the night, noddled, passes and the text remains yet unuttered while you and the once sleeping fountains hurt my ears. Help me, for Chrissakes, Loose. Give me a beginning. I can't go on. I can't go on "without form and void". I, we humans, need beginning again and again. So what is the first sentence to be?

Loose (sitting up, shoulders back, wide grin, tossing his empty paper cup out the window victoriously) : Why, perfectly moi, of course, mon chere frere le pere du merde como le merde de dieu... Luciferian, splendiforous offering, veritable Fruit of Good and Evil-ish while chawing my licorice disguising breakle breath, as meaningfully mollifying as "Goddesh, Gol' darn, Goddamn and Godot with Eden Apple Pie, my my!!" Begin the beginning thusly,

I see another invitation to your knowledge world.


To be continued...



Jung's "Cloud-Cuckoo-Land" in Context


Jung's journey from Cloud-Cuckoo-Land began when he fell from Freud's grace for daring to think on his own and not buy the dogma of the Oedipal complex. Transferences and countertransferences (which are projections from personal and cultural history and transpersonal archetypal images from the collective unconscious) between both men were strong and mythic, from the very beginning. Jung had always been "his own man" in terms of character and thought (he was not a follower) and upon discovering Freud's ideas which paralleled some of his own as he researched and worked clinically with schizophrenics he contacted Freud, started a correspondence and "settled down to learn something" from Dr. Freud, almost 20 years his elder. Their first meeting together lasted 13 hours!!

That Freud had discovered the repressed within the human unconscious and found that an anamnesis seemed to allay symptoms unleashing expressions of the repressed and espressed
natural human instincts (as in espresso, compressed steam jamming through compacted black grinds (a good image of the personal unconscious, that) released an exhilerating sense of freedom in individuals and eventually in European and American culture. Eros was unleashed at last from churchy or other confines.. Dionysus was given sway in dance halls and tea rooms created boom boom room for ecstasy and unitive states with consequent and true to the archetype dismemberings and derangements of the senses which began a process of derangement and rearrangement of collective values of Europe and America. This has not ceased for Pandora's Box is forever opened and the cosmological rope-a-dope of renaissance has now gone global and many people the world over are extremely unsettled and unhappy, therefore reactive, often violently so.

Jung, intoxicated by Freud's find, prior to his discovery of Freud had already begun to explore on his own "the treasure buried in the field", the human psyche (which means soul), in the psychiatric hospital of Burgholzli, there exploring the meaning in madness he encountered in his schizophrenic patients which once kenned might restore some healthy conscious functioning of ego. Also the techniques of mezmerism/hypnosis and all the fascination of, with and by the manifestations of the unconscious, occult included, had at last began to be almost legitimately studied by science. Freud, Bleuler, Rhine, Jung and many more plowed the ground of "the field with the treasure" against great consternation of the science of their day. Yet in spite of these predictable resistences the excitement and promise of scientific discovery began to swell with the growing capacity for technological advancement via modern machinery of all kinds, along with pioneering inroads into the human psyche. All this was intoxicating as the growing zeitgeist of progress, an extention of Darwin's idea of evolution, in culture and technology nurtured high hopes for individuals and civilization. Onward and upward. Progress! The unconscious repressed aspects, what Freud called the unconscious and what Jung came to call the shadow, once identified could be channeled via psychoanalysis and expressed in more civilized ego fashion and the now made conscious sublimated id directed into more creative expression. Art, religion, science and the myriad inventions of human culture are none other than redirected creations of repressions up from"id central". All human productions through time could be uncovered to be humankind's attempt to hide, to sublimate, disguise, alter the repressed discontents of the unconscious. Civilization, it was Freudianly seen, grew in proportion the repressed contents of the human psyche. If one could discover and release repressions then a new era of wholer humanity may ensue, or so was the hopeful belief.

Young Jung wrote a letter to Freud before their famous rupture in which he described ecstatic hopes for equally young and randy psychoanalysis in bringing back the "god of the vine and wine, Dionysus, into Christianity" which in Jung's time and, alas, ours presently, held no positive place for nature and the instincts, particularly sexual and agressive instincts. If one views the German film, Young Doctor Freud, one will also see that repressed sexual instincts in general along with the repressed feminine in men while women were literally oppressed and driven mad was predominant in civilized (meaning instincts repressed, denied, judged, hidden and if outted then hided) society. This was also prevalent in the Jewish cultural community of those days as the Young Doctor Freud film and any good history book will confirm. This repression, as Freud came to call it, was part of the cultural zeitgeist of the Western world, secular, Chrisitan and Jewish in the late 1800's. Thus when Freud's work began to be taken more seriously, and when Jung discovered it, there was much controversy and excitement about the positive prospects of releasing repressions in more natural yet conscious expressions. There had to be a backlash and there was but the pioneering men and women of modern psychology were driven by the very repressed energies now unleashing to risk ridicule, ire and banishment for the sake of science helping humanity to evolve. (Here is an online source for getting a greater sense of the cultural climate of Freud and Jung's time, the four part series by Adam Curtis and the BBC, especially part one, called "The Century of the Self":

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=895317227382599915ei=BFOHSfLkGorEqQLUoNz7Cg&q=the+century+of+the+self+part+1&hl=en)


Jung's Enthusiastic Letter to Freud

"...Religion can be replaced only by religion...Only the wise are ethical from sheer intellectual presumption, the rest of us need the eternal truth of myth...But 2000 years of Christianity have to be replaced by something equivalent. An ethical fraternity, with its mythical Nothing, not infused by any archaic-infantile driving force, is a pure vacuum and can never evoke in man the slightest trace of that age-old animal power which drives the migrating bird across the sea and without which no irresistible mass movement can come into being...I think we must give it time... ever so gently to transform Christ back into the sooth-saying god of the vine, which he was, and in this way to absorb those ecstatic instinctual forces of Christianity for the one purpose of making the cult and the sacred myth what they once were -- a drunken feast of joy where man regained the ethos and holiness of an animal. That indeed was the beauty and purpose of classical religion, which from God knows what temporary biological needs has turned into a Misery Institute. Yet how infinitely much rapture and wantonness lie dormant in our religion, waiting to be led back to their true destination! A genuine and proper ethical development cannot abandon Christianity but must grow up within in, must bring to fruition its hymn of love, the agony and ecstasy over the dying and resurgent god [Dionysus-Zagreus], the mystic power of the wine, the awesome anthropophagy [eating the flesh, drinking the blood] of the Last Supper -- only this ethical development can serve the vital forces of religion...One can only let this kind of thing grow." (excerpted from C.G. Jung Letters, Volume 1, pages 18/19)

Fifty years later when a student of Jung's read this letter and wrote to him with quotes from it Jung responded:

"Best thanks for the quotation from that accursed correspondence. For me it is an unfortunately inexpungable reminder of the incredible folly that filled the days of my youth. The journey from cloud-cuckoo-land back to reality lasted a long time. In my case Pilgrim's Progress consisted of my having to climb down a thousand ladders until I could reach out my hand to the little clod of earth that I am." (ibid.)

It would take many cyber pages here to trace Jung's descent to the "little clod of earth" of himself and it is well worth the effort and study but this is not the intent here of this little essay. Suffice it to say that when I first read this letter, a recovering Christian fundamentalist of the Calvinist theological cult, I was absolutely thrilled, intoxicated like Jung, by his vision for a return of ecstasy and instinct to Christianity and culture. I was befuddled by his refutation and wanted to write my own letter to him saying, "Oh but your were right and are right. We must return to the ecstasy of the animal that we are and, as you say, we must consciously do so. You are all about a conscious awakening and consequent evolution and expression further in time of this contradiction that we are, animal and human (homo sapiens), irrational and rational, instinctual and ethical (ethical meaning humans having a capacity forconscience and thus live channeling the instinctuals healthily (enough) while consciously being aware of living in relationship to the other), natural and spiritual. You have spent your life discovering evidence that nature is sublime and sacred as it is and that spiritualities derived therefrom are a further expression of nature and matter, of spirit as matter, of matter as spirit. Teilhard de Chardin, whom you were approvingly reading much of in the final years of your life even has a book, Hymn of the Universe, where he sings "the life of the Cosmic Christ working out in the world of matter by that world's most powerful force, the free spirit of man in union with God." Or as you would say, Dr. Jung, the Self (Atman)."

A part of me still pleads for Jung not to recant that youthful folly. And now, myself older, I understand how Jung arrived at his regret, my having read him more deeply and widely now and with perhaps enough personal Jungian analysis to begin to practically understand and apply, how his youthful and enthusiastic expectation of a mass movement is a folly, how he came to understand that human masses, mass men, are not individuated, but are merged and of herd-animal mind, how individuation, that process of meaningful yet painful personal integration of anima, animus, and shadow (most often the animal part of ourselves, the protoplasmic self, as I call it) by nature sets one apart from the masses though one must live within and in relationship to masses, groups, institutions large and small, sacred or secular. Jung understood how groups demand and reify merge-mind with compliant conduct and eventually frown upon individuation if it means moving out of all that. My understanding of Jung's later understanding is that what he spoke of in his youthful letter had to be accomplished within the individual. This is hard enough. If more and more individuals imperfectly yet earnestly work their end of it then perhaps the collective, the masses, will be influenced.

We can look at contemporary culture and see this is so. Now, many television programs and talk shows use Jung's term, the shadow. The culture assimilates some of what he and others are/were about but can only go so far unless individuals ongoingly do their work. Jung realized that his work would eventually go the way of all mass markets and be popularized, consumerized, institutionalized and therefore greatly adulterated so he wanted to be involved with all that while he was alive so he could have a say and an impact upon how all this might take shape while trying to guarantee some accuracy regarding his discoveries, his writing and analytical principles and methods. That Jung has had an impact upon culture is not in doubt and he is still much debated, often maligned and misunderstood if paid attention to at all. Nonetheless he was taken up, all too willy nilly and, frankly, cloud-cuckoo-landly by the hippie movement which evolved into much of the what is known as the New Age movement. Most common notions of Jung in the culture are what I call "hippie Jung" which is not at all who or what Carl Jung is about. I encourage a careful reading of one of these three more accessible works by Jung if you want to deepen your understanding of his work in contradistinction to "hippie" or "New Age Jung":

Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Jung's autobiography
Modern Man In Search Of A Soul, essays
Man and His Symbols, essays by Jung and several of his proteges

A final note about Jung's youthful letter -- in it are lifelong themes which Jung delved into in great scholarly and personal depth. Jung's love of Nature compelled him into science. A deeply contemplative man who grew up in the Christian religion of his community, his father and many uncles were Christian ministers, Jung also was deeply impressed by the power of religion and sought in his work to bring science and religion into some beginning and more accomodating understanding of the other. Jung located spirit in nature and found evidence for and spent his life working on gathering this evidence from the manifest records of human history, myth, religion, arts, sciences, and dreams. Jung's work theoretically and practically demonstrates the presense of an innate religious or spiritual biological function within humans. He often repeated as he was repeatedly (and willfully) misunderstood that as a scientist he had set out to prove the objective existence of a "god-image" but that he could not prove the ontological existence of god. That, he said, he left for theologians. But he could trace human history from archaic man to his present and find images that earliest humans were aware of something greater to their existence than themselves and what they perceived by the human senses, an innate intuition that there is more to existence than, as I like to say, meest the eye or thigh. From cave drawings and other archeological evidence and then from recorded history Jung concluded that humans ongoingly have had god-images which oriented them in some way as to meaningful existence. These could and should be studied and lived with to presently ferit as much as possible from them those living energies, what Jung calls archetypes, within them which turned the wheel of human consciousness forward.

This early letter also very much reveals Jung's lifelong relationship not only to religion in general but to the Christian religion which, as some writer has characterized, Jung "put on the analytical couch." Jung's work on alchemy was a later development of his studies and research in religion and Christianity in particular for alchemy combined nature (science) and religion (Christianity with gnostic, kaballa and other influences). Jung's essay, "Transformation Symbolism In The Mass" carries further Jung's earliest interest and enthusiasm for a return to the ecstatic by serious scholarship, study and depth understanding of the profound archetypal symbolism in the mass. When I first read this essay years after I had left the Christian church Jung moved me to tears of discovery of the profound meaning of the symbols and rituals of the Communion Mass. Further writings and explorations of Christianity underscore this earliest interest, his love-hate, relationship with it to the end. Yet Jung did not study Christianity exclusively. His interest in world religions, particularly the religions of the East, gave us many essays, some of the earliest in Western culture, about meditation, yoga, the Tao and I Ching. It is from these essays that the Beats of the '50's, the hippies of the 60's and the New Age movement which follows found their way to Jung. I would encourage a first reading or a rereading of these works to truly understand that Jung was not a "New Age prophet" though his openness of mind and spirit to all expressions of man's soul make him a friend to all religious seekers. For those interested in Jung's writings on the Far East and its religions there is one convenient volume now available with 12 essays and forwards; Psychology and the East, Bollingen Series, Princeton University Press, 1978.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

"Untie, Or Break That Knot Again" - On Resolutions And Why We Fail Them


[Alex D. of Oaxaca, Mexico. The New Year is often depicted as an infant signifying the dissolving back to beginnings, simpler forms, in Western alchemy. Congrats to Monica and Luis, proud parents of Alex who brings a smile and warmth in this photo for one and all at the beginning of 2009.]

solve (v.)
c.1440, "to disperse, dissipate, loosen," from L. solvere "to loosen, dissolve, untie," from PIE *se-lu-, from reflexive pronoun *swe- + base *leu- "to loosen, divide, cut apart" (cf. Gk. lyein "to loosen, release, untie," O.E. -leosan "to lose," leas "loose;" see lose).
resolve (v.)
c.1374, from L. resolvere "to loosen, undo, settle," from re-, intensive prefix, + solvere "loosen" (see solve).
resolution
1412, "a breaking into parts," from L. resolutionem (nom. resolutio) "process of reducing things into simpler forms," from pp. stem of resolvere "loosen" (see resolve).
dissolve
c.1374, from L. dissolvere "to loosen up, break apart," from dis- "apart" + solvere "to loose, loosen"

Why most New Year's resolutions (and ongoingly through the year) do not work is perhaps inherent etymologically in the word itself which indicates a "breaking apart, a reduction of things into simpler forms, a loosening, undoing, untieing, untangling, dividing, unsettling and cutting apart". Honestly, who actually wants that? Who needs it in terms of time, attention, energy, patience and persona in our busy lives with self, others, and the "getting and spending" of consumer society which packages and encourages much of what we are resolving to tone down, parse, eliminate and banish from our daily lives? To actually undergo the dissolving process inherent in the word resolution is not what we consciouslly sign up for every New Year when we make our resolutions. What we unconsciously sign up for in making resolutions is most often ongoingly excoriating, disorienting and often conjures the hidden energies and issues beneath the presenting problem, habit, symptom and behavior we've resolved to change. Alchemical processes of transformation involve our ultimate assent and surrender to That Greater Will (God, Higher Power first manifested as a complex, a symptom, habit, addiction, etc) which has mugged us, dragged us kicking and screaming or innocently whistling on our "naive New Age tuffets eating curds and whey" from everyday mindless path-walks into the woods, the wild, the waste places --"we're not in Kansas anymore, Dorothy"-- and into the bubbling cauldron or oven of many a myth and fairy tale witch.

In Western alchemy the phase of "solutio" or "solution" is one in which things are dissolved in water. Rituals using water evolved when early ancestors noticed that solid things seemed to disappear in water, they broke down, dissolved and lost form. To resolve then is to undergo a process of dissolution, dissolving, a loosening and losing of form and structure, rendering things back to simpler first forms. These simple forms are called prima materia in alchemy which is the raw stuff of the psyche/soma, the as yet to be cooked material of the innocent self. The prima materia is what brings us into therapy, counseling, psychological and spiritual work. This rough stuff, untamed, wild, and instinctual, conflicts with the "smoother" aspects of personality (persona = mask) and ego and thus begins theconflict of alchemical phases of individuation.

During New Year celebrations we often participate in group events which involve formal and informal rituals of dissolution from religious services of sermon and song to inebriated imbibing of alchololic drinks while merging (a form of solutio) into celebratory group/collective mind in the Time Squares of the world. Group mind is a collective pool, if you will, in which we become one with the many who have become one in ritual and revelry as we collectively dissolve the old year and self into a new born babe (that oft seen image of the new year as a crawling, be-diapered infant wearing a top hat), a new self we resolve to become or work toward in the new year. With sophisticated world-wide media we are able to be in dens and livingrooms with televisions and computers tuned in enabling us to literally participate in the global pool/solutio going on from one time zone to another, a species-wide dissolutio event of group intoxication and merging as one to ring out the old year and self whilst ringing in the new "naked" year and self to come.

These outter rituals are most easy to do and one often gladly participates in them, however, the actual personal alchemical processes alluded to in our resolutions are such chronic, intense and disorienting experiences that scarcely anyone will assent to submit to them unless forced to by the psyche/soul which insists via addictions, symptoms, events, disruptions of routine self that one undergoes the lifelong alchemical procedures of crushing (called nigredo in alchemy), solutio (dissolving/breaking apart), calcinatio (burning to reduce hard accretions of prima materia into more refined states with the heat of the fires drying out our affect/emotion laden complexes), sublimatio (not sublimation ala Freud but refining into essense), putrefactio and mortificatio (decay and death of hardened parts of self), the goal of all this leading to the creation of the philosopher's stone, the agua permanens, the essential conscious self in conscious relationship to
the Self, Jung's term for the central organizing and mysterious factor of the psyche from which our conscious selves are derived. This relationship of self with Self is called the Divine Marriage and is the goal of alchemical transformation.

One of the inherent meanings of resolution is to untie, to loosen. The very word "analysis" literally means to untie, to loosen the knots. Psychoanalysis, Jungian analytical psychology, and consequent developments of subsequent psychological theory, technique and evolving schools of psychology are about this untieing, loosening of psychological knots which can usher us into alchemical transformative processes. In this most difficult yet meaningful work we need guides who have undergone and are currently undergoing the alchemical processes which we all undergo but mostly unconsciously whereupon many of our treatments and cures are chemical of medical and addictive variety or naively positive and irritatingly simplistic. To enter the alchemical laboratory of counseling, therapy and spiritual traditions with appropriate and "cooked/cooking" guides values the procedures of alchemical transformative phases. We suffer but we suffer meaningfully and not alone. Jung says that meaningless suffering is hell. To arrive at the felt meaning and actual ripening of and within difficult passage elevates our experience of the journey from nigredo, the crushing, darkening beginning phase of beginning changes, to Coniunctio, none other than the sacred inner marriage of opposites within ourselves, of masculine (animus) and feminine (anima), of ego with shadow, of self with Self.

To conclude, resolution also means to hold firm, this holding firm during and after breaking apart, dissolving and undergoing the process of alchemical change, consolidates authentic psychological maturity which endures the difficult phases of change. In this submission which is an admission (the first step in twelve step programs) we are no longer (or less, at least) victims of life, of somatic, psychological, spiritual, and social powers and, most importantly, our Higher Power as we experience It, whom/which is driving/enforcing the changes upon and within us. Jung's rediscovery of the transpersonal nature, the Self and It's archtypes, of our complexes, addictions, symptoms, and issues reorients us toward more meaningful endurance, suffering and arrival made new even within the apparent but transparent limits of our personal history. We surrender to the Greater Self and hold firm that the work will be complete and whole, not perfect, which holds all personal and transpersonal opposites not as contraries but as dynamic creative complements intent on continuing what was/is begun at beginning (a kaballistic rendering of the first verse of the book of Beginnings or Genesis is, "In the beginning is beginnings".) Our knots become sacred means by which we encounter the contractions and constructions of material and psychological existence, its joys and vicissitudes (meaning "changeably, in turn," from vicis "a turn, change") with our eventual gracious (enough) though vociferous submission to That Grace which bestows encountered in every alchemical phase of changes in many guises. In assent and consent we are loosened from that personal will power which creates our well meant yet naive resolutions humbly recognizing that Greater Will (we know It when we see, hear, touch, taste, smell or intuit It) which batters, bends, knocks and breaks us all the while enthralling and ravishing us in, with and by It's Mysterious Palpable Presense. [In a future essay I'll speak of that Presense experienced as Absence and Emptiness.]

John Donne
's Holy Sonnet #14 is the prayer of one in the midst of surrender to That Which dissolves us, assenting to the dissolving phase of alchemical change, his understanding that these changes are brought about not from the self, the ego with all of it's will power, but by that which is greater, the Self of Selves which Jung calls the Self and Donne calls God :


Batter my heart, three-person'd God ; for you
As yet but knock ; breathe, shine, and seek to mend ;
That I may rise, and stand, o'erthrow me, and bend
Your force, to break, blow, burn, and make me new.
I, like an usurp'd town, to another due,
Labour to admit you, but O, to no end.
Reason, your viceroy in me, me should defend,
But is captived, and proves weak or untrue.
Yet dearly I love you, and would be loved fain,
But am betroth'd unto your enemy ;
Divorce me, untie, or break that knot again,
Take me to you, imprison me, for I,
Except you enthrall me, never shall be free,
Nor ever chaste, except you ravish me.

********************************************

[There are enough accessible books now available which detail this alchemical process of transformation which is not an escape from matter which most religions seem to be geared to, especially those of the West, but a transformation process into more conscious matter, awakened matter which does not escape material existence so much as consciously inhabits it and in so doing, says Jung, affects all levels of existence. Two books I highly recommend for ongoing study of alchemical processes of transformation are:


Anatomy of the Psyche, Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy,
by Edward F. Edinger
The Emerald Tablet, Alchemy For Personal Transformation, by Dennis William Hauck

It goes without saying that reading all of Carl Jung's work on alchemy especially while undergoing the phases of transformation from break down to reunion/marriage of self with Self will continually orient you within the tumult of the stages. Having the books and a guide who has and is currently and continually undergoing the "refiner's fire" of Self and Psyche companions one, contains and orients one throughout. Alchemical change is an intense ongoing experience of cooking and refinement in all ages of life. It is never done though there are many who think they have arrived, veritable souffles of shimmering spirituallity, done with shit and shadow. Beware working with those as you will inevitably carry and undergo their unfinished work (if ever begun) and shadow which is ongoing work all the way to the end.]

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Part Two - "Are We Lost Yet" -- A Gypsy Cab Author Caught In A Texas Milky Way


[For Part One of "Are We Lost Yet" go to the "Blog Archive" menu on the upper right and click onto the only other December link, "Part One, etc."]

Coda - 1753, from L.
cauda "a tail."

And so it was I entered the broken world to trace the visionary company of love. -- Hart Crane

...the drunken taxicabs of absolute reality... -- Allen Ginsberg

Mark the first page of the book with a red marker. For, in the beginning, the wound is invisible. -- Edmund Jabes


Gather ye nosebleeds while ye may.

This is for R. M.


*********************************************


A man of many false starts..."
-- first sentence from the manuscript I'm writing of below.


Estimado hermano Moises,


The first sentence launches the piece and the story carries itself along like, say, a veteran of the Iraq war cabbie I know driving here and there in a Texas town doing so because that's where the money is, compelled to dirt roads and back streets one would never intentionally go to if not for the need of money, forcing a broken-legged hobo's freedom of sorts to make mutually agreed upon brief commitments with strangers to destinations ending with a discharge and a fare-thee-well. Between customers arrives the graveyard shift nightly migration to the Waffle House for respite, rituals of grease, gravy and grinning at the Medussa-wigged waitress with echolalia. Petrochemical company flares just across the highway signal Mammon Wasteland Theology's Trinket Sacraments to the folks who live in and around this mess, a desert kingdom of the far flung, you being one of them now, home from the war, exile before and after, returning to the beat up but beloved truck that also tells a story and leaves a stain -- to Jake and his slow breakdown or break in, and the hard lesson of earnest Private Hodges trapped in his pattern of wanting approval and love ill sought from the gold-toothed refugee Drill Sergeant Thomas, late of Liberia, a wannabee Jehovah with too much power over America's young game boys shipwrecked onto military shores.

As everyday and makepiece the settings and the people are you make me love them, even those chemical companies and the justly reactive radioheads, their words blown out of cab windows -- you write, "the wind blows away our words" -- to be heard all the way here in the East Village, New York City, the words, discarded or dragged screaming from a passing cab, compel compassion, curiosity and hint of a calm eye in the center of the eternal return of dispatches to the corner of Crackhurst and Waffle House and back again. This eye observes, swerves to miss the Mexican kid chasing the ball into Same Ol' Street ("same as it ever was" -- David Burne), notes it with caffeine, amphetamine laced, and traces "the visionary company of love"-- stubbed cigarettes, sputum maps coughed and spat.

As justly bitter (unlike the bland and tepid Waffle House coffee) as the writer's voice may sometimes sound there is a tremendous compassion and sorrow heard for these faces and places. This "broke hearted" uttering does, indeed, trace the visionary company down on "those mean streets" of Texas and World missing a few teeth, unfurling like remote prayerflags in coldest Himalayas fluttering and flung from gypsy cab windows, unheard hiccups of eventing into the oblivion of the obvious -- flutter-flap ancient technologies of cloth strung holy in bleak majesty articulate and plead "Mercy" for all the species, eventually our own, obliterated by human tracings, Gate Gate Paragate Parasamgate Bodhi Svaha...GONE, GONE, GONE BEYOND, COMPLETELY GONE BEYOND, ENLIGHTENMENT, HAIL.

Keep going with this and the other pieces...the line was strung years ago when you were just a kid in "Father Bob And "What The Fuck" Land" and all the books (which are NEVER false starts) read and to be read and written since then and now and to come, and the suffering and isolated hours and forlorn miles in the merciless cab, flap and flutter with real voice about poor human choices which, even at their worst, are votes for visionary company in those universes revealed even in Texan and Iraqi sand. It is so brilliantly human to find the diamond in the shit.

It's damned good you are in-spired in the debris of progress, a wake-dreamed jeweler mining away, in-breathed, while sucking those cigarettes and lovers, the hashbrowns, along Texas highways and byways waiting for another dispatch to Bumfuck and Divine.

The psalmist says it right, no matter the blight:

Let everything that hath breath praise the Lord!!

I await another dispatch prayer for the far flung tracers.


Abrazos bien fuerte
,


Warren

[Above Photo by Warren Falcon, "Mexican Cab And Straw Wheels", Apizaco, Tlaxcala, Mexico, January 2008]